Decomposition Model of the Total Store Purchase and Its Application

Songting Dong,Ping Zhao,Gao Wang,Raymond R. Liu
2008-01-01
Abstract:EXTENDED ABSTRACT To investigate customers’ purchase behavior, researchers usually decompose the total store purchase (TSP) into the product of average single purchase and patronage frequency within a certain period of time. Previous study holds an assumption that single purchase payment (SPP) and inter-purchase time (IPT) are two independent variables (e.g. Colombo & Jiang 1999; Fader, Hardie & Lee 2005; Schmittlein & Peterson 1994). Though it does not mean that previous researchers believe SPP and IPT are actually independent, the independent assumption is widely used in the analyses of purchase data tendency to keep mathematics tractable. Instead of using the previous assumption, we propose a decomposition model of TSP based on the assumption that SPP and IPT are interdependent. The new assumption is discreetly examined based on the observation and analysis of consumer purchase behavior. We divide consumers’ purchase behavior into three stages: whether to go shopping or not, which store to go, and finally how much to purchase. With the analysis of these three stages, it is quite clear that SPP and IPT are interdependent. Previous purchase quantity (represented by SPP) and how long it has been last will together influence the decision of whether to go shopping or not. If the customer decide to do shopping in the target store, current IPT for the certain store is determined. Then previous SPP and IPT will exert their impacts on purchase quantity decision, thus current SPP is obtained.However, the interdependency of SPP and IPT could probably be concealed by a seemingly insignificant correlation coefficient. For each customer within a target store, we propose that there exists an upper limit of total demand, the changing of which may lead to insignificant correlation coefficient. If the limit of total demand does not change much, the more SPP is, the longer IPT will be, and vice versa. This is constraint effect of the total demand . But if the upper limit changes, which means a customer focus his/her purchase
What problem does this paper attempt to address?