Abstract:Objective To establish a set of rules for autoverification of blood analysis, in order to provide a way to validate autoverification rules for different analytical systems, which can ensure the accuracy of test results as well as shorten turnaround time (TAT) of test reports. Methods A total of 34 629 EDTA-K2 anticoagulated blood samples were collected from multicenter cooperative units including the First Hospital of Jinlin University during January 2017 to November 2017. These samples included: 3 478 cases in Autoverification Establishment Group, including 288 cases for Delta check rules; 5 362 cases in Autoverification Validation Group, including 2 494 cases for Delta check; 25 789 cases in Clinical Application Trial Group. All these samples were analyzed for blood routine tests using Sysmex XN series automatic blood analyzers.Blood smears, staining and microscopic examination were done for each sample; then the clinical information, instrument parameters, test results and microscopic results were summarized; screening and determination of autoverification conditions including parameters and cutoff values were done using statistical analysis. The autoverification rules were input into Sysmex Laboman software and undergone stage Ⅰ validation using simulated data, and stage Ⅱ validation for post-analytical samples successively. True negative, false negative, true positive, false positive, autoverification pass rate and passing accuracy were calculated. Autoverification rules were applied to autoverification blood routine results and missed detection rates were validated, and also data of autoverification pass rate and TAT were obtained. Results (1)The selected autoverification conditions and cutoff values included 43 rules involving WBC, RBC, PLT, Delta check and abnormal characteristics. (2)Validation of 3 190 cases in Autoverification Establishment Group showed the false negative rate was 1.94%(62/3 190)(P<0.001), autoverification pass rate was 76.74%, passing accuracy was 97.47%; Validation of 2 868 cases in Autoverification Validation Group, the false negative rate was 3.38%(97/2 868)(P=0.002), autoverification pass rate was 42.26%, passing accuracy was 92.00%; Validation of Delta check on 288 cases in Autoverification Establishment Group and 2 494 cases in Autoverification Validation Group showed the false negative rates were respectively 1.39% and 2.61%(P<0.001). (3)Three hospitals adopted these rules of autoverification for 25 789 blood routine samples, and found that the average TAT of blood routine test reports were shortened by 24min, 32min and 7min respectively, the rate of samples reported within 30min were elevated by 33%, 53% and 7%. The autoverification pass rates were 72%-74%. Conclusions The application of this set of 43 autoverification rules in blood sample analysis can ensure test quality while shortenTAT and improve work efficiency. It is worth pointing out that for the same analytical systems in this research, validation is necessary before application of this set of rules, and periodic validation is required during application to make necessary adjustment; for different analytical systems, as this research provide a way to establish autoverification rules for blood routine tests.Clinical labs may establish their own suitable autoverification rules on the basis of technological parameters. (Chin J Lab Med, 2018, 41: 601-607) Key words: Autoverification rules; Blood analysis; Validation; Turnaround time; Miss rate

Establishing and validating of an laboratory information system-based auto-verification system for biochemical test results in cancer patients.

The Application Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support in Auto-verification and Interpretation of Laboratory Test Results

Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory

A qualitative study on users′experience of intelligent laboratory test system

Development and Implementation of Autoverification Rules for ELISA Results of HBV Serological Markers

Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study.

A Multi-Center Research on the Establishment and Validation of Autoverification Rules for Blood Analysis

Combined Strategy of Knowledge-Based Rule Selection and Historical Data Percentile-Based Range Determination to Improve an Autoverification System for Clinical Chemistry Test Results.

Establishment and application of autoverification system for HbA1c testing

Clinical Application of UF-1000i in Combination with AX-4280 for the Screening Test Ability of Urinary Formed Elements.

Ensure the accuracy and consistency of biochemical analyzer test results: Chemometrics for instrument and inter-instrument item comparison in Chinese hospital laboratory

A multicenter study on the establishment and validation of autoverification rules for coagulation tests

[Preliminary Study on the Identification of Aerobic Vaginitis by Artificial Intelligence Analysis System]

Establishment and discussion of autoverification rules for transfusion compatibility testing

Method Performance Verification of the Clinical Chemiluminescence Immunoassay

Evaluation of AI-Driven LabTest Checker for Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety: Prospective Cohort Study

Verification of examination procedures for 72 biochemical parameters on the atellica® clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzers

Analytical Validation of an Early Detection Pancreatic Cancer Test Using 5-Hydroxymethylation Signatures

Development of the Personalized Criteria for Microscopic Review Following Four Different Series of Hematology Analyzer in a Chinese Large Scale Hospital

Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications

A multicenter research on validation and improvement of the intelligent verification criteria for routine urinalysis