Clinical Effects of Two Oral Care Methods on Orotracheal Intubation Patients:A Meta Analysis

Ye WANG,Shu-yue LIU,Yan GUO,Hui-ying QIN
2014-01-01
Journal of Nursing
Abstract:Objective To compare the different effects of toothbrush-irrigation and wiping with cotton ball for oral care of orotracheal intubation patients. Methods Computer retrieval was conducted in large databases at home and abroad, meanwhile literature review and references were tracked for undetected literatures. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the included studies were determined then Meta analysis was carried out for comprehensive and quantitative analysis for different effects of oral care methods. Results Totally 21 studies (2 494 patients) were included for Meta-analysis. The incidence of VAP [Combined RR=0.49, 95% CI (0.39, 0.62)], bad breath [Combined RR=0.29, 95% CI (0.21,0.41)] and oral ulcers [Combined RR=0.40, 95%CI (0.29,0.57)] in patients with toothbrush-irrigation was lower than those wiping with cotton ball. The difference in the amount of plaque index in patients with toothbrush-irrigation and those wiping with cotton ball was statistically significant ( P<0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that there was less amount of plaque index in patients with toothbrush-irrigation than those wiping with cotton ball. The difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with toothbrush-irrigation and in those wiping with cotton ball was not statistically significant [P=0.15, Combined WMD:-1.02, 95%CI (-2.41,0.37)]. Conclusion The effect of toothbrush-irrigation is better than wiping with cotton ball for orotracheal intubation patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?