UNIT CONFIGURATION AND CONSTRUCTION LOGIC OF GRASSROOTS SOCIAL SELF-GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION IN URBAN AREAS: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE "KETANGJIAN" SELF-GOVERNANCE MODEL IN QINGPU DISTRICT, SHANGHAI, CHINA
Вен Ман,Шанхай Шанхайский политико-юридический университет,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-19-38
2023-06-01
STATE AND MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT SCHOLAR NOTES
Abstract:. In 2019, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Communist Party of China Central Committee emphasized the "acceleration of modernizing urban social governance," which has significant theoretical and practical implications. In 2020, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 19th Communist Party of China Central Committee further proposed requirements such as "strengthening and innovating urban social governance" and "improving the level of urban governance and strengthening risk prevention and control in mega-city governance," pointing out the direction for the next step of modernizing the urban governance system and governance capacity. Urban social governance is an important dimension of national governance and plays a pivotal role in the national governance system. This requires accurate analysis and clarification of the relationship between national governance and local governance, grassroots governance and social governance, urban governance and county-level social governance, and village governance, and promoting the organic combination of the "system of self-governance, governance based on moral principles, and governance by law," to truly achieve the orderly social operation of self-governance, governance based on moral principles, powerful governance by law, and orderly politics. The construction of the institutional framework and mechanism innovation of urban social governance requires the governance content and behavior to be located in appropriate spatial areas and governance units, to flexibly and conveniently form combinations and reconstructions of governance units of different levels, types, and subjects according to local conditions. To optimize the spatial scale of urban social governance, shift the governance focus downwards, and continuously consolidate the pivot and base of modernizing urban social governance, in order to better form a rural-urban integration social governance system with top-down linkage, horizontal interaction, facility connectivity, and data integration, and effectively give full play to the value and function of grassroots governance units to undertake the heavy responsibility of promoting the modernization of national governance.