Method Comparison of Artificial Frontal Drill and XPS Frontal Drill

季俊峰,王秋萍,李泽卿,王天友,江满杰,汤健,程友,吴昆旻,陈伟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8868.2009.06.030
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To introduce the equipments, application methodology, procedure of artificial frontal drill and XPS frontal drill, and discuss the difference, advantages and disadvantages of them in the endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. Methods The clinical data of 43 adult patients (59 sides)suffering from chronic sinusitis with frontal sinus involved were analyzed retrospectively. The frontal sinus ostium was identified by the help of artificial frontal drill(20 cases) or XPS frontal drill(23 cases), and the efficacy was evaluated via postoperative follow-up of all cases. Results The ostia of frontal sinus were successfully opened in all cases, and no serious complications occurred. After following-up 18 to 44 months postoperatively, the symptoms vanished in all cases and none recurred. The endoscopic examinations showed well-opening of frontal sinus ostia. Conclusions There is some difference between the artificial frontal drill and XPS frontal drill on the procedure and methodology. The XPS frontal dill is more powerful and rapider, and there is no difference in the safety and reliability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?