Quantitative study of differential diagnosis between acute cerebral hemorrhage and calcification by using spoiled GRE T2 dual echo MRI

韩鸿宾,郎宁,裴新龙
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2004.07.002
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study a rapid and quantitative method for the diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage at superacute stage by MRI, and to define the quantitative criterion of the differential diagnosis between acute cerebral hemorrhage and calcification by using FLASH T2 dual-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Methods FLASH T2 dual echo imaging with TE of 15ms and 35ms was performed in 8 cases (13 lesions, Group A) of acute cerebral hematoma and 5 cases (14 lesions, Group B) of calcification. The final diagnosis of each case was proved by CT which was taken as golden standard. The measurement was performed under the chosen window width and center. The ratio of the dark area at different TE values was compared between Group A and B, and the anterior-posterior (A-P) and the right-left (R-L) diameter of the dark area under different phase encoding directions was also measured and compared between the two groups. Results The enlargement ratio of the dark area at different TE values was statistically different between group A and B ( P 0.01), and the mean value of Group A (0.44, 0.34-0.49) was greater than that of Group B (0.11,-0.06-0.09). The A-P or L-R diameter under different phase-encoding direction was not changed significantly in Group A with TE of 15 ms and Group B with both TE values ( P 0.05), while the diameter under different phase-encoding direction was significantly different in Group A with TE of 35 ms ( P 0.05). Conclusion The quantitatively differential diagnosis between acute cerebral hematoma and calcification is available by the ratio of dark area at different TE values, or by the changes of A-P/L-R diameter under different phase-encoding directions. The susceptibility difference between hematoma and the brain parenchyma should be greater than that between calcification and the brain parenchyma, which should be the biophysical basis for the quantitative differential diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?