The dose-response relationship between ginsenoside Rd injection and spinal cord ischemic injury in rabbit

MA Li,CHEN Yu,SANG Hanfei,XIONG Lize
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2897.2010.05.010
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the dose-response relationship between ginsenoside Rd injection and ischemic injury of spinal cord in rabbits.Methods Forty male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=8). Spinal cord ischemia was induced for 20 min by infrarenal aortic occlusion under anesthetization with pentobarbital sodium. Control group received no pharmacologic intervention. Group Rd-5,Rd-10,Rd-20 and Rd-40 received intravenous infusion of 5 mg/kg,10 mg/kg,20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg ginsenoside Rd within 1 h before aortic occlusion,respectively. Neurological function was scored at 4 h,8 h,12 h,24 h,and 48 h after reperfusion. Tissue (L5~7) for histopathologic examination was prepared by hematoxylin-eosin staining at 48 h after reperfusion.ResultsAll animals survived in the experiment. Forth-eight hours after reperfusion,there was no statistic difference in neurological function score and the number of normal neurons of anterior spinal cord in group Rd-5 compared with control group (P>0.05); there was statistic difference in normal neurons of anterior spinal cord in group Rd-10 but no difference in neurological function score compared with control group (P>0.05); there was significant statistic difference in neurological function score and the number of normal neurons of anterior spinal cord in group Rd-20 and Rd-40 compared with control group (P<0.01),but no statistic difference was found between group Rd-20 and Rd-40 (P>0.05). There was significant correlation between neurological function score and the number of normal neurons of anterior spinal cord in each group (r=0.769. P<0.01). Conclusion Ginsenoside Rd injection can effectively reduce neurological injury induced by spinal cord ischemia and reperfusion in a dose-response manner within a certain dosage range.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?