Navigating Brain Metastases: Unveiling the Potential of 3-Tesla Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ghaith Altawalbeh,Maria Goldberg,Michel Gustavo Mondragón-Soto,Chiara Negwer,Arthur Wagner,Jens Gempt,Bernhard Meyer,Amir Kaywan Aftahy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16162774
2024-08-06
Abstract:Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has witnessed significant growth in the field of neurosurgery, particularly in glioma surgery, enhancing image-guided neuronavigation and optimizing the extent of resection (EOR). Despite its extensive use in the treatment of gliomas, its utility in brain metastases (BMs) remains unexplored. This study examined the effect of iMRI on BM resection. This retrospective study was conducted at the neurosurgical center of the University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich and involved 25 patients with BM who underwent resection using 3-Tesla iMRI between 2018 and 2022. Volumetric measurements of the resected contrast-enhancing metastases were performed using preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative MRI images. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and neurological status of the patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Local recurrence and in-brain progression were reported in patients who underwent follow-up MRI at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In this cohort (n = 25, mean age 63.6 years), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common origin (28%). The mean surgical duration was 219.9 min, and that of iMRI was 61.7 min. Indications for iMRI were primarily associated with preoperative imaging, suggesting an unclear entity that is often suspicious for glioma. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 21 patients (84%). Continued resection was pursued after iMRI in six cases (24%), resulting in an improved EOR of 100% in five cases and 97.6% in one case. Neurological status postoperatively remained stable in 60%, improved in 24%, and worsened in 16% of patients. No wound healing or postoperative complications were observed. Among the thirteen patients who underwent follow-up MRI 3 months postoperatively, one patient showed local recurrence at the site of resection, and seven patients showed in-brain progression. Of the eight patients who underwent a 6-month follow-up MRI, two showed local recurrence, while three exhibited in-brain progression. The observed favorable profiles of GTR, coupled with the notable absence of wound-healing problems and acute postoperative complications, affirm the safety and feasibility of incorporating iMRI into the neurosurgical workflow for resecting BM with specific indications. The real-time imaging capabilities of iMRI offer unparalleled precision, aiding meticulous tumor delineation and informed decision-making, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes. Although our experience suggests the potential benefits of iMRI as a safe tool for enhancing EOR, we acknowledge the need for larger prospective clinical trials. Comprehensive investigations on a broader scale are imperative to further elucidate the specific indications for iMRI in the context of BMs and to study its impact on survival. Rigorous prospective studies will refine our understanding of the clinical scenarios in which iMRI can maximize its impact, guiding neurosurgeons toward more informed and tailored decision-making.