12th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology CHARACTERIZATION OF BUBBLING FLUIDIZATION REGIME BY ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS
Xiang Jie,Li Qinghai,Zhang Yanguo
2018-01-01
Abstract:Statistical, power spectral and chaos analysis methods were used to analyze pressure fluctuations in a bubbling fluidized bed. The effects of superficial gas velocity, static bed height, particle size and position of pressure probe on the flow behavior were investigated. For the bubbling fluidized bed in this work, the flow regime can be further divided into three subregions. The flow behavior in terms of Kolmogorov entropy at the bottom of the bed was more complex than that at the upper part of the bed. Kolmogorov entropy decreased with increasing static bed height. The amplitude of pressure fluctuations increased with the superficial gas velocity and the static bed height. The dominant frequency of pressure fluctuations in the bed decreased with the static bed height and was independent of axial position of the pressure tap and particle size as gas velocity reached a certain value. INTRODUCTION Gas-solid fluidized beds are widely used in industrial processes (Kunii and Levenspiel, 1991). Their performances strongly depend on the flow dynamics. Nonlinear particle-particle and particle-gas interactions lead to complex flow behavior of the gas-solid two-phase flow. The characteristics of the gas-solid flow are influenced by many factors. Geldart (1973) classified particles into four groups (A, B, C and D). Particles in each group have similar fluidizing characteristics, but particles within the same group can reach different types of fluidization regimes with increasing superficial gas velocity (Ug). Researchers (e.g. Grace, 1986; Li and Kwauk, 1980; Yerushalmi and Cankurt, 1979) have proposed various two dimensional diagrams to predict the flow regime under different conditions. Grace (1986) proposed a simple and clear flow regime diagram using dimensionless particle size and superficial gas velocity, which is more useful for engineering practice. However, in the diagram, each typical flow regime is mapped onto a region, covering a relatively wide range of particle diameters and gas velocities. When a more specific description of the flow behavior is needed, each typical flow regime should be further divided into smaller regions with more details. Quantitative description of flow dynamics in a fluidized bed can be obtained from the analysis of fluctuating signals, such as pressure fluctuations and local solids concentration fluctuations. Pressure is often chosen because it is a significant indicator of dynamics of gas-solid fluidized beds and easy to measure even under industrial conditions (Bi, 2007; van Ommen et al., 2011). On the other hand, it is complicated to obtain useful information from pressure fluctuations and then interpret the results (van Ommen et al., 2011). Early studies on pressure fluctuations in gas-solid fluidized beds mainly focused on the oscillating phenomena in the bed. Several models have been proposed to predict the dominant frequency (Baskakov et al., 1986; Verloop and Heertjes, 1974; Hiby, 1967). Among the early researchers who studied pressure fluctuation, Fan et al. (1981) investigated the causes of pressure fluctuations and the effects of gas velocity, bed height, particle size and distributor design on the dominant frequency and amplitude of the fluctuations. Researchers have tried various time-series analysis methods, including time domain analysis, frequency domain analysis and chaos analysis to analyze pressure fluctuations, comparison between which have been reviewed (Johnsson et al., 2000; Sasic et al., 2007; van Ommen et al., 2011). Time domain analysis is mainly performed by statistical calculation of pressure fluctuations such as standard