Abstract:Summarise the established knowledge on this subject.Middle-aged and older patients are at high risk of rectal adenocarcinoma; however, studies comprehensively analysing its predictors and the construction of visual nomogram models are limited.Most studies that reported on the prediction of colorectal cancer-related survival models had limited samples and included data from a single centre. The included predictors were limited, or the evaluation indicators were not easy to obtain, greatly limiting clinical application.With the advancement of medical care, the clinical outcomes of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma have changed. Therefore, new, more comprehensive, and practical indicators are required for constructing clinical prediction models to effectively determine the prognosis of patients.What are the significant and/or new findings of this study?We included demographic and clinicopathological data from thousands of middle-aged and elderly patients with rectal adenocarcinoma to find relevant prognostic factors. New cut-offs were developed and used for the construction of nomograms.The nomogram constructed this time has excellent predictive ability and clinical decision-making ability, and has good clinical practicability.The nomogram survival prediction model constructed this time can effectively help evaluate the prognosis of middle-aged and elderly patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and guide the selection of clinical treatment measures.To develop a new nomogram tool for predicting survival in middle-aged and elderly patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.A total of 6,116 patients were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the training set, and two nomogram prognostic models were constructed. The validity, accuracy, discrimination, predictive ability, and clinical utility of the models were assessed based on the concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and decision curve analyses.Predictors of OS and CSS were identified, and nomograms were successfully constructed. The calibration discrimination for both the OS and CSS nomogram prediction models was good (C-index: 0.763 and 0.787, respectively). The AUC showed excellent predictive performance, and the calibration curve exhibited significant predictive power for both nomograms. The time-dependent AUC showed that the predictive ability of the predictor-based nomogram was better than that of the TNM stage. The nomograms successfully discriminated high-, medium-, and low-risk patients for all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. The decision curve demonstrated that the nomograms are useful with respect to good decision power.Our nomogram survival prediction models may aid in evaluating the prognosis of middle-aged and older patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and guiding the selection of the clinical treatment measures.

Editorial Commentary: Regression Modeling and Nomograms in Biomedical Research Are Valuable Decision-Making Tools When Externally Validated and Well Maintained

Drawing Nomograms with R: Applications to categorical outcome and survival data

Overview of model validation for survival regression model with competing risks using melanoma study data

Reporting and Methods in Developing Prognostic Prediction Models for Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

External Validation of the Prognostic Prediction Model for 4-Year Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Review of Methodological Workflow, Interpretation and Limitations of Nomogram Application in Cancer Study

Parametric Regression Model for Survival Data: Weibull Regression Model As an Example

Decision Curve Analysis: a Technical Note

Should we use nomograms for risk predictions in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients? A systematic review

Prediction of cancer-specific survival and overall survival in middle-aged and older patients with rectal adenocarcinoma using a nomogram model

Can We Reliably Identify the Pathological Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer? Development and Validation of a Logistic Regression Nomogram Based on Preoperative Factors

Development and Validation of Nomograms for Predicting Overall and Breast Cancer–Specific Survival in Young Women with Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Simplenomo: A Python Package of Making Nomograms for Visualizable Calculation of Logistic Regression Models

Regression analyses and their particularities in observational studies

The Use of Resampling Methods to Simplify Regression Models in Medical Statistics

Investigation of statistical methods used in prognostic prediction models for obstetric care: A 10 year-span cross-sectional study

Don't be misled: Three misconceptions about external validation of clinical prediction models

Developing and Validating a Nomogram Model for Predicting Ischemic Stroke Risk

Are Nomograms Useful for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Melanoma Patients?

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation

Statistical Development and Validation of Clinical Prediction Models