Capsule endoscopy compared with double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel diseases:A meta-analysis

CHEN Xiang,RAN Zhi-hua,TONG Jin-lu,XIAO Shu-dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2007.04.009

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective Capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy are both effective tools for the diagnosis of small bowel disease.We performed a meta-analysis to compare the yield of capsule en- doscopy(CE) with that of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE).Methods Pubmed,Embase,Elsevier Sci- enceDirect and the China Academic Journals Full-text Database were searched for the trials comparing the yield of CE with that of DBE.Outcome measure was odds ratio (OR) of the yield.Fixed or random model method was used for data analysis.Results Eight studies (n = 277) which prospectively compared the yield of CE with that of DBE were collected.The results of meta-analysis indicated that there was no difference be- tween the yield of CE and DBE [170/277 vs 156/277,OR 1.21 (95% CI:0.64,2.29) ].Based on sub- analysis,the yield of CE was significantly higher than that of double-balloon enteroscopy without combination of oral and anal insertion approaches [137/219 vs 110/219,OR 1.67 (95% CI:1.14,2.44),(P< 0.01) ],but not superior to the yield of DBE with combination of the two insertion approaches[26/48 vs 37/ 48,OR 0.33 (95% CI:0.05,2.21),(P>0.05) ].A focused recta-analysis of five fully published arti- cles about obscure GI bleeding was also performed and showed that the yield of CE was significantly higher than that of DBE without combination of oral and anal insertion approaches [ 118/191 vs 96/191,fixed mod- el:OR1.61 (95 % CI:1.07,2.43),(P<0.05)];the yield of CE was significantly lower than that of DBE by oral and anal cornbinatory approaches [ 11/24 vs 21/24,fixed model:OR 0.12 (95 % C1:0.03,0.52), (P<0.01)].Conclusion With combination of oral and anal approaches,the yield of DBE might be at least as high as that of CE.Decision made on choosing the initial approach should depend on patient's physi- cal status,technology availability,patient's preferences,and potential for therapeutic endoscopy.