Abstract:Based on the six"985"higher-learning institutions as research objects,and 159 doctoral student enrollment guides from the six"985"higher-learning institutions in 2017 as research samples,the author establishes such observation indexes as those for application conditions,evaluation mode,evaluation criteria,decision power of supervisor,and supervision mechanism.Through the study,the author finds that in terms of application preconditions,the priority is given to English proficiency and scientific research results,but unfortunately,it is suspicious that university origin discrimination exists;in terms of examination methods,written test is still in use,yet it is still difficult to evaluate a candidate's ability in oral examination or an interview;the stipulations of evaluation criteria and scoring methods are vague,making the evaluation more subjective and arbitrary;the supervisor's personal decision making power in student admission is too big,which brings risk to a selection of justice and fair;the supervision mechanism lacks detailed and comprehensive regulations that may leave room for the abuse of enrollment power.Therefore,the author proposes to abolish the restrictions on university origin and change the rigid conditions into elastic conditions;to combine various assessment methods together and evaluate candidate quality in all directions;to make the evaluation standard index-like and reduce the subjective arbitrariness in evaluation;rationally allocate the decision making power to supervisors and follow the principle of score-based admission;and to improve supervision and safeguard mechanisms,improve other improvement measures such as supporting system and quality-insurance mechanism.

Strengthening Reexamination to Promote the Admission Quality of Graduate Students

Retrospect and Prospect of University Entrance Examination

The Trains of Thought,Principles and Policy Suggestions about University Entrance Exam Reform

A Study on Setting Up the Quality Assurance Mechanism of Higher Education Self-study Examination

The Combination of Fairness and Science in the Reform of College Entrance Examination

The Reform of College Entrance Examination： Priority to Fairness or Efficiency

About the selection of graduate student enrollment source and system reform

Examination Exemption for Excellent Students and Its Effect on Students Capability and Quality Cultivation

Where Should the Reform of the New National College Entrance Mathematics Subject Examination Go:From no Distinction to a Little Distinction Between Arts and Sciences

On the College Entrance Examination Reform under the New Curriculum Reform

On the Nature and Phenomena of College Entrance Exmination Competition

Status Quo Of,problems In,and Way to Improve Doctoral Student Application,Examination and Admission System:Based on the Textual Analysis of the Doctoral Student Enrollment Guides from Six"9 8 5"Higher-Learning Institutions in 2 0 1 7

Pursuit of Fairness:Perhaps It is the Root Cause of University Entrance Examination to Make Mistakes

The reform of process of doctoral candidate recruitment

Pushing Reform in the Examination System to Improve the Quality of Education

The Reform of College Entrance Examination:Accountability’s Unbearable Weight under the Background of High School Curriculum Reform

On Reform of Graduate Education on the Base of the First-Level Discipline

A Study of Doctoral Qualifying Examination

Reforming Pathology Examination System to Strengthen the Quality Cultivation of Medical Students

Reflections on the History of the Reform of College Entrance Examination

Three Key Issues in the Reform Programs for the Chinese College Entrance Examination