Abstract:Objective To develop Chinese Card Sorting Test (CCST) as an efficient, brief test for evaluating executive function in Chinese elderly. Methods Thirty ⁃ five patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), 69 cases with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [amnesic MCI⁃single domain (aMCI⁃s), 25; amnesic MCI⁃multiple domain (aMCI⁃m), 24; non⁃amnesic MCI (naMCI), 20] and 124 cognitively normal controls (NC) were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests including CCST. Three sets (including figures, words and numbers) of cards were adopted. Each set had 6 cards. Subjects were asked to sort cards according to shape, number, color and meaning. Full mark was 4 for each set and 12 for total 3 sets. Results 1) Comparison among NC, MCI and AD: according to test score, in NC group, Set Ⅱ was most difficult while Set Ⅰ was the easiest. However, in MCI and AD group, patients' scores were similar among 3 sets, which indicated that the discriminative efficacy was same among 3 sets. Set Ⅰ and Ⅲ sorting started with "color" and followed with "meaning". Set Ⅱ sorting started with "meaning". The accuracy score for Set Ⅱ was the lowest which may due to the inhibition effect of "meaning" against other sorting strategy (similar as "the Stroop effect"). "Number" was the most difficult and least adopted sorting dimension. There were few misclassification which indicated that the test design produced few misunderstanding. When the total score of CCST ≤ 6, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating AD was 94.32% and 74.24%, respectively. When the total score of CCST ≤ 5, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating AD was 74.35% and 89.52%, respectively. For subjects with low education, optimal cut⁃ off score should be selected as ≤ 5. For subjects with high education, optimal cut⁃off score should be set as ≤ 6. 2) Comparison among 3 MCI subgroups: the score in naMCI subgroup was the lowest (4.25 ± 2.07), while in aMCI ⁃ s subgroup was the highest (6.68 ± 1.65). The score in aMCI ⁃ m was between the 2 above subgroups (5.16 ± 2.26). There were significant differences among the 3 subgroups (P < 0.01, for all). CCST can be used to differentiate amnesic and non⁃amnesic MCI. There were significant differences between aMCI ⁃ s and naMCI for all 3 sets of cards. Significant differences only existed for Set Ⅱ between aMCI⁃m and naMCI. There were significant differences among 3 subgroups in "color" dimension. There were no differences among 3 subgroups in "number" and "meaning" dimension. There were significant differences between aMCI and naMCI in "color" and "number" dimension. There were no differences between aMCI and naMCI in "shape" and "meaning" dimension. Conclusion Chinese Card Sorting Test is an effective, rapid and usable test for differentiating amnesic and non⁃amnesic MCI. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2010.02.014

[Validity of Complex Figure Test in Differentiation of Alzheimer's Disease from Non-Dementia].

Rey-Osterriche Complex Figure Test Used to Identify Mild Alzheimer’s Disease

Validity Study of Animal-City Alternating Form Fluency Test in the Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

The Discriminant Validity of Single-Question Assessments of Subjective Cognitive Complaints in an Asian Older Adult Population.

Evaluation of Various Memory Tests for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Validity of Long-delayed Recall Test on the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease

Chinese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for Discrimination among Different Severities of Alzheimer's Disease.

[The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of AD8].

Chinese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for Discrimination among Different Severities of Alzheimer’s Disease

Application of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test in Chinese nor Mal Old People

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Chinese Version of the Trail‐Making Test for Screening Cognitive Impairment

Validity of Auditory Verbal Learning Test in Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Part

Validation of a Computerized Cognitive Training Tool to Assess Cognitive Impairment and Enable Differentiation Between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.

Cross-cultural difference and validation of the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults residing in Eastern China: preliminary findings.

Development of Chinese Card Sorting Test and Its Validity Assessment

Discrepancy of the Two Clock Drawing Tests in Evaluating Alzheimer's Disease

Validity of Verbal Fluency in Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Comparison of Chinese version of ADAS-Cog scores among the elderly with mild cognitive impairment,Alzheimer's Disease and normal control

A study of validity of a new scoring system of clock drawing test

Supermarket Verbal Fluency Test in Identification and Differential Diagnosis of Dementia