Abstract:Objective·To evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines of obstructive sleep apnea(OSA)published worldwide.Methods·The guidelines of OSA were retrieved in PubMed,Embase,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Data,SinoMed,MedSci,The Cochrane Library,and the websites such as Medlive,U.S.Preventive Services Task Force(USPSTF),National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE),New Zealand Guidelines Group(NZGG),Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network(SIGN),and Guidelines International Network(GIN)from establishment to December 2022.Two reviewers screened the literature and extracted the main information independently,using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ(AGREE Ⅱ)and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare(RIGHT)to evaluate the quality of the included OSA guidelines.Subgroup analysis was performed according to the publication regions of guidelines.The inter-evaluator consistency test was also performed and the results were expressed as the intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC).All the included guidelines were read entirely and the clinical questions they raised were summarized.Results·A total of 35 OSA guidelines were included.The ICC value of 0.975 showed a good inter-evaluator agreement.The results of AGREE Ⅱ showed that the average score of all guidelines was(63.60±16.45)%,with a minimum of 23.40%and a maximum of 91.67%.In the six domains,the scores of"Rigor of development"[(56.07±25.89)%]and"Applicability"[(53.57±15.52)%]were relative low.The average reporting rate of RIGHT of all the included guidelines was(67.84±20.03)%,with a minimum of 14.29%and a maximum of 94.29%,and the three domains with the lowest reporting rates were"Review and quality assurance"[(31.40±45.51)%],"Funding and conflict of interest declaration and management"[(56.43±33.95)%]and"Other aspects"[(56.19±36.85)%].Subgroup analysis showed that guidelines in Asian had a lower score in"Rigor of development"and a lower overall score of AGREE Ⅱ than the guidelines in America and Europe(both P<0.05),and the reporting rates in the domains of"Evidence"and"Other information"of RIGHT of the Asian guidelines were also lower than those in the guidelines in America and Europe(P<0.05).These guidelines focused on 42 clinical questions which were classified to 3 aspects,i.e.screening and diagnosis,treatment and long-term management of OSA.Conclusion·The quality of current global OSA guidelines varies a lot,and they need to be strengthened in terms of rigor of development,applicability,review and quality assurance,funding and conflict of interest declaration and management,especially those in Asia.

Evidence-based Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Stomatology in China

Analysis of Clinical Guidelines Developed Based on Evidence in China

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.

An Introduction to Clinical Practice Guideline for Chinese Undergraduates in Stomatology.

Quality Assessment of Clinical Guidelines in China: 1993 - 2010.

Investigation and Evaluation of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in Medical Journals in 2019: Analysis of the Evidence

P044 Quality Assessment of Traditional Chinese Clinical Guidelines: 2003–2012

Clinical Epidemiology in China Series. Paper 4: the Reporting and Methodological Quality of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published Between 2014 and 2018: A Systematic Review.

[Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Procedure and Standard].

Quality assessment of Chinese clinical practice guidelines in orthopedics

Analysis on status of clinical guidelines and evaluation on evidence-based guidelines of children in China

Quality Assessment on Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in China

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension in China: A Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality

Evaluation of Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline/consensus for Digestive Diseases

Analysis of the Status and Trends of Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline Development Between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review

Quality Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus Published in China Between 2007 and 2017 Using the AGREE II Instrument.

Guideline for [clinical Guidelines Constitution/Amendment] in China.

Using AGREE II to Evaluate the Quality of Traditional Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines in China.

Problems and Strategies in Developing Chinese Medicine Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

[Quality assessment of global guidelines on colorectal cancer screening].

Quality assessment of global obstructive sleep apnea guidelines