Clinical analysis of 116 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1

Liyang CUI,Shuwang ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1861.2013.01.004

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the different treatment and prognosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1(CIN1) . Methods 116 patients who underwent cervical cancer screening and were confirmed of CIN1 from March 2008 to August 2008 recriuted in this study. They were divided into follow-up group (63 cases) and treatment group (53 cases). In treamtment group, 41 patients underwent physical therapy, 7 cases received cervical conization and, 5 cases underwent LEEP. All patients were followed up for 2 years. Results At 24 months, the rate of regress, sustained and cumulative progress in all the 116 patients were 61.82%, 34.55% and 5.45% ( all were CIN2) . In follow-up group, the rate of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) positive was 14.55%(8/55) and 6 cases were persistent positive of HR-HPV at 24 months. 3 progressive cases were all HR-HPV positive. The recurrence rate in physical therapy patients were 4.88% and none patients relapsed in cervical cone biopsy or LEEP treatment group. Conclusions Most CIN1 could regress and HPV could naturally be cleared, but those with persistent positive HR-HPV may at high risk of progressive lesions. Cervical cone biopsy or LEEP should be performed in those suspected High grade level. Physical therapy is not recommended for the high recurrence rate.