Galiforme Population Densities in Laojunshan Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province

LU Gang,DAI Bo,LI Ren-gui,YANG Jie,ZHANG Xiu-lei,FENG Sheng-lin,RAN Jiang-hong,YUE Bi-song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7083.2007.03.024
2007-01-01
Abstract:A call count method was used to survey the pheasants of Laojunshan Nature Reserve,Sichuan Province from April to May 2006.Distances were estimated to calling males from points positioned in three broad habitat types:primary forest,secondary forest,and replanted forest.The Distance data collected from survey points were analyzed using Distance software to produce overall and habitat-specific density estimates.Calling males of four species of pheasant were encountered using the call count method:Chinese Bamboo-partridge Bambusicola thoracica,Lady Amherst's Pheasant Chrysolophus amherstiae,Sichuan Hill-partridge Arborophila rufipectus,and Temminck's Tragopan Tragopan temminckii.Overall densities of calling males were estimated to be 20.19 ± 6.07/km2(B.thoracica),1.48 ± 0.46/km2(C.amherstiae),4.24 ± 0.60/km2(A.rufipectus),and 11.19 ± 2.97/km2(T.tragopan).Habitat-specific density estimates were in some cases limited by small sample sizes,although we still present estimates for these galliform species.It appears that the highest densities of calling male B.thoracica(26.89 ± 8.92)and C.amherstiae(2.92 ± 1.42)are found in replanted forest,while the lowest densities of these two species seemed to be in primary forest(7.19 ± 4.19,1.19 ± 0.58).Calling male A.rufipectus was recorded at highest density in primary forest(7.94 ± 0.99),which was significantly different to densities in secondary(3.06 ± 0.60/km2).The estimated density of calling male T.temminckii was significantly higher in primary(17.66 ± 5.98/km2)and secondary forests(12.58 ± 4.85/km2)than in replanted forest,in which no birds were recorded.The diversity,evenness and dominance of the pheasant communities in each habitat type were compared using Shannon-Wiener index,Pielou index and Simpson index.The diversity and evenness of pheasants was highest in secondary forest(H = 1.06,E = 0.77)and lowest in primary forest(H = 0.83,E = 0.60),while the dominance was highest in primary forest(C = 0.53)and lowest in secondary forest(C = 0.43).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?