Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma.

Chang Su,Kevin A Nguyen,Harrison X Bai,Sean R Christensen,Ya Cao,Yongguang Tao,Giorgos Karakousis,Paul J Zhang,Guiying Zhang,Rong Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001780
2019-01-01
Dermatologic Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND It remains controversial if Mohs surgery is superior to surgical excision in treating localized sebaceous carcinoma. OBJECTIVE To compare Mohs surgery and surgical excision for treating patients with localized sebaceous carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS The US National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed Stage 0 to 2 sebaceous carcinoma from 2004 to 2014. Clinicopathologic and socioeconomic factors were compared between treatment groups using the chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis. Relative survival analyses compared with age- and sex-matched US population were performed. RESULTS Of 1,265 patients, 234 received Mohs surgery and 1,031 received surgical excision. Mohs surgery had a higher rate of negative margin (p = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Mohs surgery was associated with longer OS than surgical excision (HR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.496-0.995, p = .047). The survival benefit of Mohs surgery persisted on relative survival analysis and propensity score-matched analysis (p = .0385), after matching the 2 groups on patient and disease characteristics. CONCLUSION Patients who received Mohs surgery had significantly longer OS when compared with those who received surgical excision. Prospective clinical trials comparing these treatment paradigms are warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?