Abstract:Security protocols are distributed programs designed to ensure secure communication in a network controlled by an adversary. They are widely used today for securing on-line services such as personal communication and electronic voting. Their design is notoriously error-prone, and a great deal of research has been devoted to their analysis. In this thesis we provide two main contributions towards the automated analysis of such protocols: algorithms for the symbolic analysis of equivalence properties, and a symbolic probabilistic framework for security protocol analysis. We consider the problem of verifying two equivalence properties relevant in protocol analysis: static equivalence and trace equivalence. Both notions model the property that an attacker cannot distinguish between two protocol executions, and they have been used to model security goals such as off-line guessing, electronic voting anonymity, and RFID untraceability. Static equivalence is concerned with an attacker who passively eavesdrop on a network and then tries to distinguish between possible executions by performing off-line computations. Trace equivalence is used in the analysis of security properties against an attacker who may participate actively in protocol execution. We present an efficient decision procedure for static equivalence under equational theories generated by subterm convergent rewriting systems. This class of theories encompasses the most common cryptographic primitives, including symmetric and asymmetric encryption and decryption, hash functions and digital signatures. Our algorithm achieves a better asymptotic complexity than competing algorithms, albeit with a narrower scope. We discuss its implementation in the FAST tool and show that it indeed performs much more efficiently than other existing tools for the same task. We also present a procedure for deciding the trace equivalence of bounded simple processes under equational theories generated by convergent rewriting systems and for which a finitary unification algorithm exists. Although we do not have a termination result, our procedure is correct for the largest class of equational theories handled by any existing procedure for deciding trace equivalence and, together with the work by Cheval et. al [64], it is the only one to handle non-trivial else branches. Finally, we introduce a symbolic probabilistic framework for the analysis of security protocols. Our framework provides a general method for expressing weak-

Using Construct Categorical Algebra Language for Formal Description of Cryptographic Protocol

Categorical composable cryptography: extended version

How to Formalize Loop Iterations in Cryptographic Protocols Using ProVerif

A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Timed Security Protocols.

Verification of Design Decisions in Communication Protocol by Evaluation of Temporal Logic Formulas

A diagrammatic calculus for categorical quantum protocols

The Inductive Approach to Verifying Cryptographic Protocols

LπCET: A Logic Security Analysis for Cryptographic Protocols Based on π‐Calculus Extension Theory

Security Theorems via Model Theory

LpiCT: A logic security analysis framework for protocols

BAN-like Logic for Cryptographic Protocols Analysis: a Survey

Model Checking and Cryptographic Protocol Analysis

Equivalence Properties and Probabilistic Reasoning in Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis

Formal Verification of Quantum Protocols

Model Checking Needham-Schroeder Security Protocol Based on Temporal Logic of Knowledge

Categorical interpretations of some key agreement protocols

Security Formalizations and Their Relationships for Encryption and Key Agreement in Information-Theoretic Cryptography

On formal verification of arithmetic-based cryptographic primitives

Combined Analysis Method for Security Protocols

Construction Method Of Boolean Functions Based On Genetic Algorithm

Formal verification of higher dimensional quantum protocols