Comparison of four methods and their efficiency for total RNA extraction from leaves of pinellia ternata

Lin WU,Jian-ping XUE,You-ming XU,Zhen-dong TIAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.2008.06.035
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To optimize a simple, economic, and efficient method for total RNA extraction with high-quality from mature leaves of Pinellia ternata which has plenty of polysaccharides, phenols, and many other chemical substances. Methods: Four methods, i.e. guanidine isothiocyanate, bentonite, CTAB-LiC1, and the modified SDS/phenol, were used to extract the total RNA. Then the results of the extraction were compared and analyzed by electrophoresis, UV spectrophotometer detection, and RT-PCR verification. Results: Among all of the four methods, the bentonite method took only about 3-4 h, which was half time of the other three methods, and the cost of extracting 1 g leaf was 1/13-1/14 of the other three. The 18S and 28S bands of the total RNA extracted by bentonite method were clear and no dispersion, the integrity of the RNA was well, and there was no obvious contamination with proteins and other impurities in the RNA extracts. The ratios of A260/A280 were equal to 1.8- 2.0 and A260/A230 over 2.0, the yield of total RNA was higher at 365. 744 μg/g fresh weight. The total RNA was applied to RTPCR test. Conclusion: The bentonite method is quick, economic, and efficient for the total RNA extraction from the leaves of P. ternata. The RNA is suitable for DDRT-PCR, Northern blotting, cDNA library construction, and other molecular biology research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?