Analysis of the effect of microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
王守森,陈其钻,蔡智基,黄银兴,魏梁锋,金清东,洪景芳,刘峥,黄生炫
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20210125-00053
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To observe the effect of microsurgical clipping and endovascular embolization in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Methods:From January 2000 to October 2020, 3, 724 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated by Neurosurgery Department at 4 hospitals including the 900 th Hospital of Joint Support Force of the Chinese PLA. Among them, craniotomy and microsurgical clipping were performed in 2 417 cases of aneurysms, and 1 307 cases of aneurysms were embolized by endovascular treatment. The 1 ∶1 propensity score matching method was used select 415 cases in each of the endovascular embolization group and the craniotomy group, and the intraoperative and postoperative complications, follow-up efficacy and aneurysm recurrence rate of the two groups were rostrospetiely compared. Results:The intraoperative aneurysm rupture rate in the craniotomy group was 22.9% (95/415), which was higher than 17.3% (72/415) in the endovascular treatment group ( P=0.046). Except for the incidence of secondary chronic hydrocephalus, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidences of pulmonary infection, poor incision healing, intracranial infection and newly-developed cerebral infarction were all higher in the craniotomy group than the endovascular treatment group (all P<0.05). The median postoperative follow-up time of craniotomy group and endovascular treatment group was 30.0 months and 33.0 months, respectively. The last follow-up showed that the postoperative recurrence rates of the craniotomy group and endovascular treatment group were 0.7% (3/415) and 2.9% (12/415), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The results of the Glasgow outcome score showed that the outcome of the endovascular treatment group was better than that of the craniotomy group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The complication rate and therapeutic effect of endovascular embolization for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms are better than those of microsurgical clipping, but the recurrence rate of aneurysms associated with endovascular embolization is relatively high.