Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Intermittent Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy in Patients with Crescentic IgA Nephropathy

BAO Hao,TANG Zheng,YU Yusheng,WANG Jinquan,WANG Qingwen,CHEN Huiping,HU Weixin,LIU Zhihong,LI Leishi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2007.05.001
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)with pulse cyclophosphamide(CTX)therapy in the treatment of crescentic IgA nephropathy(IgAN).Methodology:Thirty-seven patients with crescentic IgAN were enrolled in this study.They were divided into MMF or CTX groups randomly.All patients received methylprednisolone(MP)pulse therapy followed by oral prednisolone.MMF group enrolled 19 cases who were treated with MMF at a dosage of 1.5~2.0 g/d.CTX group enrolled 18 cases who were given with CTX 0.75 g/m2 BSA monthly for 6 months and then quarterly.The total course was twelve months.The clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the two groups.Results:(1)Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis revealed a higher remission rate in MMF group than CTX group,with median remission time 5 and 8 months respectively.The complete remission rate and total remission rate were both higher in MMF group after 12 months(66.7% vs 25.0%,P0.05,94.4% vs 64.4%,P0.05).(2)MMF was more effective in improvement of proteinuria and serum albumin,as compared to the control group.One patient developed doubling of the serum creatinine in the CTX group after nine-months,although no difference was presented in the incidence of renal dysfunction between the two groups after 12 months.(3)As to side effects,one patient dropped out for pneumonia in CTX group after four months,while no patient suffered in MMF group.Numerical comparison showed MMF was better tolerated than CTX.Conclusion:MMF therapy may be an effective way for crescentic IgAN.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?