Retrospective analysis on results of late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy and conventional fractionation radiotherapy plus brachytherapy for esophageal carcinoma

QIAO Xue-ying,GAO Xian-shu,ZHOU Zhi-guo,WAN Xin,ZHANG Jun,ZHANG Ping,YANG Xiang-ran,乔学英,高献书,周志国,万欣,张钧,张萍,杨香然
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2006.03.006
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze and compare retrospectively the results of esophageal carcinoma treated with late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy(LCAHR) and conventional fractionation radiotherapy plus brachytherapy(CFRB). Methods From May 1994 to November 1999, 265 patients from four independent prospective studies were included in the analysis. 135 patients treated by conventional fractionation radiotherapy with 3000cGy/15f and then hyperfractionation radiotherapy(150cGy/d,twice)with 3000cGy/20f in the LCAHR group, and 130 patients by conventional fractionation radiotherapy with 5000cGy/25f plus brachytherapy with 1000cGy/2f(with a 6 hour`interval) in the CFRB group. Results The 1-,3-,5-year survival rate was 61.8%, 27.9%,19.9% and 53.5%,25.2%,18.4% in LCAHE and CFRB group, respectively(P>0.05). Acute esophagitis occurrence rate was 61.5% and 57.0% in LCAHE and CFRB group, respectively(P=0.235), and grade III esophagitis occurrence rate without any difference in the two groups. Conclusions The survival results show no difference between LCAHR and CFRB group. The technique of late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy, being easy to arrange, can be more easily carried out in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?