Abstract:Background: Acupuncture had long been a primary treatment in the healthcare system of China. In recent years, there were more and more network meta-analyses (NMAs) in the field of acupuncture and moxibustion, but the quality evaluation of NMAs was rare. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of NMAs and summarize the effects of different treatments of acupuncture and moxibustion. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), WanFang Database (WF), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched from inception to January 2020 without any language restriction. In addition, the unpublished studies and the references of initially included literature were also retrieved manually. We included all relevant NMAs treated with acupuncture and moxibustion; other therapies such as traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine may also be included, but at least three types fall under the category of acupuncture in each NMA. Outcome indicators were not limited. We selected AMSTAR2 and PRISMA-NMA to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of eligible studies, respectively. Results: In total, 29 NMAs were included finally, including 12 Chinese references and 17 English references. All eligible studies were published from May 2013 to August 2019. The number of interventions was between 4 and 22. The number of clinical trials included ranged from 10 to 121, with a total of 1098 clinical trials. The NMAs were involved in up to 23 diseases, knee osteoarthritis and primary dysmenorrhea covered with 3 NMAs separately, others focusing on chronic functional constipation, lumbar disc herniation, chronic fatigue syndrome, and the like. The Jadad scale and RoB scale were used as the bias risk assessment tools. Among them, 7 articles adopted the Jadad scale, 22 articles adopted the RoB scale (1 article adopted both the Jadad scale and RoB scale), and only 1 article did not mention the risk assessment tool. The AMSTAR2 methodological evaluation showed that the highest score was 13.5 points and the lowest was 4, with an average of 8.64 and a median of 9.5. According to the quality criteria, only one of them was in high quality, twenty-four were in medium quality, and four were in low quality. The PRISMA-NMA reporting quality evaluation showed that the highest score was 29 points and the lowest was 13.5, with an average of 23.62 and a median of 24.5; severe flaws also existed in some items, especially in "Structured summary," "Protocol and registration," "Search," "Data collection process," "Data items," "Additional analyses," "Risk of bias across studies," and "Results of additional analyses." Conclusion: The number of NMAs in the field of acupuncture and moxibustion was still in the initial stage. Overall, their methodology and reports were of moderate quality. However, severe flaws also existed in some items. Because the eligible NMAs were limited, the conclusion needed further research to confirm its authenticity and reliability.

Qualities of Controlled Clinical Trials Relevant to Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in Literatures Published in China from 1990——2009

Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China]

Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends

Analysis of the top-cited articles in the study of acupuncture & moxibustion on the treatment of coronary heart diseases

[Discussion on clinical trial design of treatment of hypertension with acupuncture and moxibustion].

Literature review on control interventions in randomized clinical trials on acupuncture published in mainland Chinese biomedical journals

Qualities of Controlled Clinical Trials Relevant to Treatment of Mental Disorders Published in China from 1992 to 2006

[Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture and moxibustion in China in past 45-year (1975-2019): hotspots and trends]

Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine Published in Chinese Journals

The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China.

Qualities of controlled clinical trials relevant to treatment of anxiety disorder published in China from 1993-2006

Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional chinese medicine RCTs: A review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews

The Quality of Methodological and Reporting in Network Meta-Analysis of Acupuncture and Moxibustion: A Cross-Sectional Survey

An Evaluation of Clinical Research Literatures in Core Journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Western Medicine or Traditional Chinese Medicine

The application of acupuncture in cardiopathy: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science across ten recent years

Analysis of the Registration Information on Interventions of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Trials in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

The quality of reports of randomized clinical trials on traditional Chinese medicine treatments: a systematic review of articles indexed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database from 2005 to 2012

Suboptimal reporting of randomized controlled trials on non-pharmacological therapies in Chinese medicine

Evaluation of the Randomized Controlled Trials Papers Published in Jiangsu Journal of TraditionalChinese Medicine from 1980 to 1998

Current Status and Evaluation of Randomized Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Evaluation on the Articles of Clinical Therapeutic Trial Published in Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine