Abstract:Recognizing the industrial sector's high energy use and vast potential for energy saving, many national governments have established voluntary or negotiated agreements that set quantitative energy-saving targets for individual industrial enterprises. The most commonly used energy-saving targets worldwide are volume and energy intensity targets. Since 2006, the Chinese government has set mandatory, enterprise-level energy-saving targets in terms of the “amount of energy saved”; this represents a unique category that differs from both volume and energy intensity targets. Based on first-hand data collected at ten case enterprises, this paper represents one of the first attempts to verify the reliability of the amount of energy saved data reported by the Chinese government and to rigorously and systematically investigate the inherent weaknesses of the amount of energy saved targets through a comparison with the mainstream categories of energy-saving targets. The ten case enterprises reported four different types of amount of energy saved. While all of the case enterprises claimed full achievement of their amount of energy saved targets, four enterprises exaggerated their performance by violating the National Standard for Calculating the Amount of Energy Saved of Enterprises. The paper thus hypothesizes that the National Top-1000 Enterprise Program's alleged achievement of performance 65% higher relative to its amount of energy saved target is likely an overestimation. Although amount of energy saved targets constitute an innovative energy-saving indicator, they do not represent a step forward from conventional volume and intensity targets because of the following four weaknesses: 1) amount of energy saved targets provide limited potential for comparison given the different types of amount of energy saved and the different calculation methods, 2) they generate uncertain environmental outcomes as it is possible to meet a portion of an amount of energy saved target through production volume expansion, 3) they are difficult to enforce due to the complexity of data verification on the part of local government agencies, and 4) they are poorly correlated with the national target for reducing energy intensity. Amount of energy saved targets should therefore be replaced with “double-control” targets that impose both volume and intensity targets on industrial enterprises.

Standardization Study on Energy Efficiency Benchmarking Management for Enterprises

Establishment and Improvement of an Assessment and Accountability System for Eco-environmental Performance Evaluation

Promoting Low Carbon Sustainability Through Benchmarking the Energy Performance in Public Buildings in China

Design and Implementation of Benchmarking System for Power Supply Companies

Barriers and Drivers for Enterprise Energy Efficiency: an Exploratory Study for Industrial Transfer in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region

An Overview of Energy Efficiency Standards in China's Transport Sector

Building energy benchmarking between the United States and China: Methods and challenges

A review of international practices for energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction and lessons learned for China

Application of Energy Efficiency Optimization Technology in Steel Industry

Status, Problems and Solutions of Energy Management Contract in China

Constructing an Energy Efficiency Benchmarking System for Coal Production

An energy management approach for the mechanical manufacturing industry through developing a multi-objective energy benchmark

Government mandatory energy-biased technological progress and enterprises' environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of cleaner production standards in China

A Thorough Assessment of China’s Standard for Energy Consumption of Buildings

Study on Standard Framework of Energy Internet

Integrated sustainable benchmark based on edge-cloud cooperation and big data analytics for energy-intensive manufacturing industries

A review on methods of energy performance improvement towards sustainable manufacturing from perspectives of energy monitoring, evaluation, optimization and benchmarking

How do regulatory environmental policies perform? A case study of China's Top-10,000 enterprises energy-saving program

Research on Evaluation Method of Integrated Energy Service Level of Power Generation Enterprises

Study of Chinese Iron and Steel Enterprises Energy-saving and Emission Reduction and Scale under the View of Technical Efficiency

Enterprise-Level Amount of Energy Saved Targets in China: Weaknesses and A Way Forward