Effect of allograft type on the prognosis of pediatric liver transplantation in low-body-weight recipients
王振,董冲,孙超,王凯,张威,郑卫萍,覃虹,韩潮,杨洋,高伟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421203-20220325-00052
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effects of different donor types on the prognosis of pediatric liver transplant recipients with low-body-weight (≤6 kg).Methods:The clinical data of low-body-weight pediatric liver transplant recipients from the Department of Pediatric Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2013 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.The recipients were divided into living donor group, split donor group and whole liver group according to the donor type.The basic information of donors and grafts, preoperative and intraoperative information of recipients, major postoperative complications and survival rates of recipients and grafts were compared.Results:A total of 244 recipients were enrolled in this study, including 183 cases in the living donor group, 18 cases in the split donor group and 43 cases in the whole liver group.There were no statistical differences in the preoperative data of the three groups, including gender, age, body weight, blood type matching, primary disease, Child-pugh grading, and pediatric end-stage liver disease score (PELD). The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in the three groups was 2.2%, 16.7% and 25.6%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant between the living donor group and the split donor group ( P=0.017) as well as the whole liver group ( P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the latter two groups ( P=0.525). The median follow-up time was 37, 31 and 47 months, respectively.The 1-year and 3-year cumulative graft survival rates were 92.9%, 91.3%, 83.3% and 83.3% 76.7%, 76.7% ( P=0.016), respectively.There was statistical difference between the living donor group and the whole liver group ( P=0.004), and no statistical difference between the split donor group and the living donor group ( P=0.212) as well as the whole liver group ( P=0.610). The 1-year and 3-year cumulative recipient survival rates in the three groups were 92.9%, 91.3%, 94.4% and 94.4%, 86.0%, 86.0%, respectively, and there was no statistical difference among the three groups ( P=0.463). Multivariate analysis suggested that donor age and anhepatic phase were independent risk factors for HAT.Cold ischemia time, volume of intraoperative blood transfusion and HAT were independent risk factors for early graft loss (within 3 months). The volume of intraoperative blood transfusion and the duration of anhepatic phase were independent risk factors for recipient death. Conclusions:Living donor liver transplantation is more effective than whole liver transplantation for children with low body weight (≤6 kg). Due to the small sample size and the early exploration stage of split liver transplantation in children, the efficacy of split liver transplantation remains to be explored in clinical practice.