Regime Legitimacy and the Maintenance of International Regime

LIU Hong-song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-723x.2005.02.019
2005-01-01
Abstract:From the perspective of economic logic, Keohane and some other neo-liberal institutionalists infer the two determinants of the maintenance of international regime ——power gap and regime performance. Regime legitimacy is excluded from their analytical framework. International regime belongs to the category of institution. Institutional legitimacy is essential for the stability of institutions (domestic institutions), which is justified by a lot of theoretical and empirical studies. Since legitimacy is important, what is the connection between regime legitimacy and the maintenance of international regime? What is the source of regime legitimacy? This article analyzes the question briefly and concludes that regime legitimacy can reduce the cost of regime maintenance, and regime legitimacy is not only rooted in regime efficiency but also rooted in the dominantly shared ideas of international society.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?