Abstract:Although Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) falls short of banning the death penalty outright, it provides for substantive and procedural requirements aimed at limiting imposition of the death penalty before its abolition. Among them is the restriction on the “most serious crimes” in jurisdictions where the death penalty remains lawful (ICCPR Article 6 (2)). Drawing on the case law of the Taiwanese Supreme Court (TSC), this chapter aims to shed socio-legal light on the role that the “most serious crimes” requirement has played in judicial rulings concerning the death penalty since the ICCPR rights became enforceable in Taiwan on 10 December 2009. It is argued that in its translation into Taiwanese judicial practice, the “most serious crimes” requirement has been read together with the domestic legal provision for individualized aggravating and mitigating circumstances under the rubric of rehabilitatibility (教化可能性), deviating from the jurisprudence of the UN human rights bodies. Under the judge-civilizer tradition prevalent in the Taiwanese judiciary, the idea of rehabilitatibility has eventually turned the judicial deliberation on whether to impose the death penalty into a valuation of the worth of the defendant’s life, with a focus on the discovery of the incorrigible offender. With its absorption into the individualizing idea of rehabilitatibility, the “most serious crimes” requirement of the ICCPR has thus become part of the pathology of judicial paternalism, suggesting a mutation of international human rights ideals in Taiwan.

The Choice of Route to Abolish Death Penalty in China

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: an Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

Rethinking of the Death Penalty System in China

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Chinese Public Opinions on Death Penalty: Measurement, Analysis and Communication

Illuminating and Learning from the "Progressive Abolition of Death Penalty Policy" in Taiwan

Opinions on Retention Versus Abolition of the Death Penalty

Death Sentence with a Two-Year Reprieve Shall Be an Inevitable Due Process

The Fate of the Death Penalty in Modern China

Retention or Abolition of the Death Penalty and Public Opinion on the Death Penalty

A Tentative Exploration into the Feasibility of Administration of Justice's Interference with Domestic Violence

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The death penalty and society in contemporary China

A Historical Cultural Analysis of Emperor Wen of the Han Dynasty Abolishing Corporal Punishment——Also Its Significance to Present-Day China's Abolition of Death Penalty

On the Death Penalty: From the Chief Editor of <i>Criminal Law Review</i>

Research on Legislation Control over Death Penalty of Robbery

Killing in Your Name: Pathology of Judicial Paternalism and the Mutation of the “Most Serious Crimes” Requirement in Taiwan

An Examination of the Death Penalty in China

System Construction for the Procuratorial Organs to Intervene Review Procedure of Death Penalty