Abstract:In multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM), one of the most important problems is to determine the weights of criteria and experts. This paper intends to present two Min-Max models to optimize the point estimates of the weights. Since each expert generally possesses a uniform viewpoint on the importance (weighted value) of each criterion when he/she needs to rank the alternatives, the objective function in the first model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual score vector and the ideal one for all the alternatives such that the optimal weights of criteria are consistent in ranking all the alternatives for the same expert. The second model is designed to optimize the weights of experts such that the obtained overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the perspectives of the experts as many as possible. Thus, the objective function in the second model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual vector of evaluations and the ideal one for all the experts, such that the optimal weights can reduce the difference among the experts in evaluating the same alternative. For the constructed Min-Max models, another focus in this paper is on the development of an efficient algorithm for the optimal weights. Some applications are employed to show the significance of the models and algorithm. From the numerical results, it is clear that the developed Min-Max models more effectively solve the MCGDM problems including the ones with incomplete score matrices, compared with the methods available in the literature. Specifically, by the proposed method, (1) the evaluation uniformity of each expert on the same criteria is guaranteed; (2) The overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the judgements of the experts as many as possible; (3) The highest discrimination degree of the alternatives is obtained.

Study of competitive assessment approach based on restriction of Nash equilibrium

Competitive Assessment Approach to Twice Circular Optimization Based on Restriction of Equilibrium

Multi-criteria Decision-Making Model Based on Satisfactory Degree and Its Application in Performance Assessment

A multiple criteria ranking method based on game cross-evaluation approach

Multi-attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Competitive View Optimization under Condition of Weights Nondictatorship

New Min-Max Approach To Optimal Choice Of The Weights In Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Problems

Determining Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Negation of Probability Distribution under Uncertain Environment

A Study of Decision Process in MCDM Problems with Large Number of Criteria

An integrated multi criteria group decision-making model applying fuzzy topsis-critic method with unknown weight information

Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units

Sensitivity Assessment of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Chemical Engineering Optimization Applications

Multiple Criteria Decision Model Based on Variable Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis

Model and Method of Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Relative Variable Weights

Multi-criteria Decision Making Based on Relative Measures

Multicriteria Decision Making with Cognitive Limitations: A DS/AHP-Based Approach.

A model for determining weights of criteria using subjective and objective information

Large-Scale Emergency Supplier Selection Considering Limited Rational Behaviors Of Decision Makers And Ranking Robustness

A New MCDM Approach Based on Cross-Impact Analysis for Ranking Dependent Alternatives

Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Cross-Evaluation with Uncertain Decision Parameters

Weighting Models to Generate Weights and Capacities in Multicriteria Group Decision Making

A Model for Decision Making with Missing, Imprecise, and Uncertain Evaluations of Multiple Criteria.