A Multicentre Study of the Safety of Ramiprill in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients

程康安,吴宁,诸骏仁
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0253-3758.2003.11.010
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the safety of ramipril 10 mg/day in high-risk cardiovascular Chinese patients, following the similar criteria as patient′s selection in the HOPE study. Methods It was a safety, non-comparative study. 76 nation-wide investigational sites were involved in this trial and 981 patients were included.Men and women ≥55 year-old were eligible for the study if they had high risk of developing major cardiovascular event. The major CV events included a history of coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes plus at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Patients received ramipril 2.5 mg orally once daily, and then were titrated up to 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d every 2 weeks. The maintenance dosage was 10 mg/d for 1 month. For patients with stable heart failure, the starting dose was 1.25 mg/d, titrating up to the same maintenance dosage (10 mg/d). Adverse events (AE) were closely followed-up and recorded. 981 patients were eligible for the study in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. 23 patients dropped out according to their request or because of protocol violation. 958 (97.7%) cases completed the study per protocol (PP). Results 880/958 (91.9%) patients reached and stayed at the dosage of 10 mg/d level. 78/958 (8.1%) stayed at 5 mg/d or 2.5 mg/d. 168 patients (17.1%) had at least 1 AE. 58 patients (5.9%) stopped the treatment due to AE, 110 (11.2%) completed the study in spite of AE. Altogether 185 instances of AE were observed, mainly including cough, dizziness, hypotension, rash and serum creatinine elevation, etc. In majority, AE were possibly or probably related to ramipril. 58 instances (5.9%) caused early discontinuation of treatment. There were 3 cases of serious AE, including 1 death, without any evidence of relationship to ramipril after investigation. Conclusions Ramipril was safe in Chinese patients with high risk of CV diseases. Patients were able to accept the full dosage of ramipril, 10 mg/d, to achieve an effective therapeutic result.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?