The Censoring Benchmark in the Constitutional Litigation

LIU Zhi-gang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3933.2006.10.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:The censoring in the constitutional litigation is the that the censorship holds to censor the correlative law. After the case of the United States v. Carolene Products Company, the duality benchmark was established gradually and brought far-reaching influence in the countries in which the constitutional litigation is established. There are three causes in establishing the duality benchmark :Firstly, the development of the state of affairs requests internally to broaden the checkup on the economical law; Secondly,the different attribute of the constitutional rights requests internally to censor the constitutional rights in different ways;Thirdly,in order to hold together the democracy and the justice of the censorship, it requests internally to censor the kw in different ways according to its character, namely, whether it is the law on the spirit freedom or the law on the economical freedom.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?