Abnormalities with Negative 18F-FDG Uptake Detected Using Non-Enhanced CT of PET/CT in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

REN Shu-hua,HUA Feng-chu,ZUO Chuan-tao,ZHAO Jun,GUAN Yi-hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2008.03.006
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of abnormalities that do not show increased 18F-FDG uptake on non-enhanced CT of integrated PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Materials and Methods: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of consecutive PET/CT scans obtained at our PET center between May and December 2006.During the eight-month period,there were 119 patients had a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.All scans were obtained with integrated PET/CT scanner(Siemens Biograph Sensation 16).Each case was interpreted independently by two experienced PET/CT physicians.All abnormalities with negative 18F-FDG uptake were recorded.The abnormalities were classified as being of major,moderate or minor significance according to the definitions previously by Ford.Results: There were 119 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent initial staging(66/119,55.5%),restaging or treatment monitoring(53/119,44.5%) PET/CT imaging during the study period.The abnormalities were located in the head and neck(n=40),thorax(n=97),abdomen and pelvis(n=128),and bony skeleton(n=18).The clinical importance of these abnormalities was classified as major n=9(3%),moderate n=121(42%),or minor n=153(54%).Major abnormalities noted in the study included 4 cases of small lung nodules,1 case of osteolytic lesion and 1 case of brain lesion suggestive of metastasis,as well as 1 case of liver mass and 2 cases of renal mass.Conclusions: CT scan in PET/CT can not be only a tool for attenuation correction and anatomic landmarks alone.Even low-dose CT can provide important diagnostic information.There is a high prevalence of CT abnormalities in non-small cell lung cancer that do not show 18F-FDG uptake,but small proportion of which has clinical significance.Diagnostic CT should be done to get more significant information in PET/CT interpretation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?