Spotting the Old Foe-Revisiting the Case Definition for TB.

Rein M. G. J. Houben,Hanif Esmail,Jon C. Emery,Louis R. Joslyn,C. Finn McQuaid,Nicolas A. Menzies,Joaquin Sanz,Sourya Shrestha,Richard G. White,Chongguang Yang,Frank Cobelens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30038-4
IF: 102.642
2019-01-01
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Abstract:Disease case definitions are important instruments for clinical care, interventional research, and surveillance. Therefore, it is concerning that the current case definitions for tuberculosis remain underscored by the classic paradigm of binary states of latent infection and active disease, with a stepwise, linear transition under which symptoms, bacteriological positivity, and disease pathology are assumed to emerge broadly together (figure, A). 1 Menzies NA Wolf E Connors D et al. Progression from latent infection to active disease in dynamic tuberculosis transmission models: a systematic review of the validity of modelling assumptions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 18: e228-ee38 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar This assumption has resulted in a reliance on symptom screening to distinguish these two states. However, in recent prevalence surveys, 40–79% of bacteriologically positive tuberculosis occurs in the absence of patient-recognised tuberculosis symptoms. 2 Onozaki I Law I Sismanidis C Zignol M Glaziou P Floyd K National tuberculosis prevalence surveys in Asia, 1990–2012: an overview of results and lessons learned. Trop Med Int Health. 2015; 20: 1128-1145 Crossref PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar Rather than explicitly addressing this discordance, tuberculosis case definitions are often ambiguous regarding tuberculosis symptoms, or internally inconsistent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?