How would nature see our corneal triumphs? The LXXIX Edward Jackson Lecture

Gerrit R.J. Melles,Jack S. Parker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.01.020
IF: 5.488
2024-01-28
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:Purpose To describe discrepancies between clinical observation and current teachings in corneal endothelial disease, particularly in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and its potential association with primary open angle glaucoma. Design and methods Perspective on Fuchs dystrophy, a disorder that commonly presents with a compromised endothelium but minimal stromal edema, indicating that the corneal imbibition pressure is relatively 'too high'. Results The discrepancy between the relative lack of stromal edema in the absence of an endothelial cell layer can not be explained by the current theories involving a circulatory pumping mechanism over the endothelial cell layer, but may point to 1) secondary involvement of the corneal endothelium in Fuchs dystrophy; 2) separate hydration systems for maintaining the imbibition pressure (vertical static hydration) and corneal nutrition (horizontal dynamic hydration); 3) the cornea as net contributor of aqueous humor; 4) a close relationship between the corneal imbibition and intraocular pressure, with potentially a shared regulatory system; 5) a potential steroid-type hormone dependency of this regulatory system. Conclusion Clinical observation shows that the stromal imbibition pressure is 'too high' in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, indicating that it may not primarily be an endothelial disease, but a type of 'corneal glaucoma'.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?