Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to verify whether the legitimate pressure of external forces on heavily polluting firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related behaviors affect firms' assurance strategy in the Chinese context. The authors argue that, under external pressure, as a source of legitimacy, the assurance over CSR reports allows the business behaviors of heavy polluters to be recognized by society. Design/methodology/approach This paper sampled listed heavy polluters in China from 2011 to 2018 and used the multiperiod logit model to examine the effects of external corporate governance on firms' assurance decisions. Principal component analysis methods were used to construct a comprehensive framework of external corporate governance. The indicators were obtained from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research databases, the NERI Report and the China Urban Statistical Yearbook. Findings This paper confirms that external corporate governance positively affects firms' assurance decisions, and good financial conditions, well-governed internal controls and sufficient government subsidies positively moderate this effect. Practical implications The findings provide feasible ways to encourage firms' high-quality corporate environmental information disclosure, thus providing valuable guidance for policymakers and other stakeholders to effectively supervise firms' CSR behaviors. Social implications The findings are of great importance in encouraging high-quality corporate environmental information disclosures, improving the support of capital markets among developing countries and drawing social attention to the environmental protection and social responsibility of heavy polluters. Originality/value The research extends the current research in the field of social environmental accounting by using legitimacy theory to explain firms' assurance motivations. Additionally, this paper focuses on the practices of assurance services in the emerging economy and provides suggestions for developing assurance over CSR reports.

Religious Atmosphere, Law Enforcement, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

Religious atmosphere, seismic impact, and corporate charitable donations in China

Religion, the Nature of Ultimate Owner, and Corporate Philanthropic Giving: Evidence from China

Does religious culture matter for corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China

Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Polluting Industries: Does Religion Matter?

Does Religion Mitigate Earnings Management? Evidence from China

Does a religious affiliation make the CEO more likely to use internal CSRs? Evidence from Chinese privately owned firms

The Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China

How Foreign Institutional Shareholders' Religious Beliefs Affect Corporate Social Performance?

External corporate governance and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: evidence from China

Environmental regulations and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China's real-time air quality monitoring policy

Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

Earnings Pressure and Corporate Social Responsibility Impression Management

The Effect of Mandatory Regulation on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Quality: Evidence from China

Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Catering to Investor Sentiment in China

Environmental Regulation and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence and Mechanism from China

Do Financial Markets Care about Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Further Evidence from China

Executives with financial backgrounds and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China

Can Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk? Evidence From China