Abstract:We present two independent, homogeneous, global analyses of the transit light curves, radial velocities, and spectroscopy of Kepler-4b, Kepler-5b, Kepler-6b, Kepler-7b, and Kepler-8b with numerous differences compared to the previous methods. These include: (1) improved decorrelated parameter fitting set used, (2) new limb-darkening coefficients, (3) time stamps modified to barycentric Julian date for consistency with radial velocity data, (4) two different methods for compensating for the long integration time of Kepler long-cadence data, (5) best-fit secondary eclipse depths and excluded upper limits, and (6) fitted mid-transit times, durations, depths, and baseline fluxes for individual transits. We make several determinations not found in the discovery papers. (1) We detect a secondary eclipse for Kepler-7b of depth (47 ± 14) ppm and statistical significance 3.5σ. We conclude that reflected light is a much more plausible origin than thermal emission and determine a geometric albedo of Ag = (0.38 ± 0.12). (2) We find that an eccentric orbit model for the Neptune-mass planet Kepler-4b is detected at the 2σ level with e = (0.25 ± 0.12). If confirmed, this would place Kepler-4b in a similar category as GJ 436b and HAT-P-11b, as an eccentric, Neptune-mass planet. (3) We find weak evidence for a secondary eclipse in Kepler-5b of 2σ significance and depth (26 ± 17) ppm. The most plausible explanation is reflected light caused by a planet of geometric albedo Ag = (0.15 ± 0.10). (4) A 2.6σ peak in Kepler-6b TTV periodogram is detected and is not easily explained as an aliased frequency. We find that mean-motion resonant (MMR) perturbers, non-resonant perturbers, and a companion extrasolar moon all provide inadequate explanations for this signal and the most likely source is stellar rotation. (5) We find different impact parameters relative to the discovery papers in most cases, but generally self-consistent when compared to the two methods employed here. (6) We constrain the presence of MMR planets for all five planets through an analysis of the mid-transit times. (7) We constrain the presence of extrasolar moons for all five planets. (8) We constrain the presence of Trojans for all five planets.

Kepler-411: a Four-Planet System with an Active Host Star

A Fourth Planet in the Kepler-51 System Revealed by Transit Timing Variations

Kepler Object of Interest Network III. Kepler-82f: A new non-transiting $21 M_\bigoplus$ planet from photodynamical modelling

Kepler-432 b: a massive planet in a highly eccentric orbit transiting a red giant

Kepler-47: A Transiting Circumbinary Multi-Planet System

The Discovery of the Long-Period, Eccentric Planet Kepler-88 d and System Characterization with Radial Velocities and Photodynamical Analysis

A Tale of Two Peas in a Pod: The Kepler-323 and Kepler-104 Systems

Predicting Planets in Kepler Multi-Planet Systems

Discovery and Characterization of Kepler-36b

Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone

AN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF KEPLER-4b THROUGH KEPLER-8b

K2-138 g: Spitzer Spots a Sixth Planet for the Citizen Science System

The detection and characterization of a nontransiting planet by transit timing variations

Mass Derivation of planets K2-21b and K2-21c from Transit Timing Variations

TOI 560: Two Transiting Planets Orbiting a K Dwarf Validated with Ishell, PFS, and HIRES RVs

A Simplified Photodynamical Model for Planetary Mass Determination in Low-Eccentricity Multi-Transiting Systems

About 30% of Sun-like Stars Have Kepler-like Planetary Systems: A Study of Their Intrinsic Architecture

TOI-4010: A System of Three Large Short-Period Planets With a Massive Long-Period Companion

Eight Planets in Four Multi-planet Systems Via Transit Timing Variations in 1350 Days

Confirmation of Hot Jupiter Kepler-41b via Phase Curve Analysis

Masses of Kepler-46b, c from Transit Timing Variations