Abstract:Abstract Penalized likelihood approaches are widely used for high-dimensional regression. Although many methods have been proposed and the associated theory is now well developed, the relative efficacy of different approaches in finite-sample settings, as encountered in practice, remains incompletely understood. There is therefore a need for empirical investigations in this area that can offer practical insight and guidance to users. In this paper, we present a large-scale comparison of penalized regression methods. We distinguish between three related goals: prediction, variable selection and variable ranking. Our results span more than 2300 data-generating scenarios, including both synthetic and semisynthetic data (real covariates and simulated responses), allowing us to systematically consider the influence of various factors (sample size, dimensionality, sparsity, signal strength and multicollinearity). We consider several widely used approaches (Lasso, Adaptive Lasso, Elastic Net, Ridge Regression, SCAD, the Dantzig Selector and Stability Selection). We find considerable variation in performance between methods. Our results support a “no panacea” view, with no unambiguous winner across all scenarios or goals, even in this restricted setting where all data align well with the assumptions underlying the methods. The study allows us to make some recommendations as to which approaches may be most (or least) suitable given the goal and some data characteristics. Our empirical results complement existing theory and provide a resource to compare methods across a range of scenarios and metrics.

High-order Data Sharpening with Dependent Errors for Regression Bias Reduction

Data Sharpening Method in Regression Confidence Band

Robust Estimation and Shrinkage in Ultrahigh Dimensional Expectile Regression with Heavy Tails and Variance Heterogeneity

Expectile regression for analyzing heteroscedasticity in high dimension

Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Expectile Regression with De-Biasing Method

Iterated Data Sharpening

Automatic and asymptotically optimal data sharpening for nonparametric regression

Estimating Functions and Derivatives Via Adaptive Penalized Splines.

Adaptive Penalized Splines for Data Smoothing

High-Dimensional Linear Regression via Implicit Regularization

Debiased Regression for Root-N-Consistent Conditional Mean Estimation

Double debiased transfer learning for adaptive Huber regression

Estimation of Out-of-Sample Sharpe Ratio for High Dimensional Portfolio Optimization

Smooth Adjustment for Correlated Effects

Debiased regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with moderately high-dimensional covariates

Online Inference with Debiased Stochastic Gradient Descent

Bias Reduction in Sample-Based Optimization

Inference in High-Dimensional Linear Measurement Error Models

Robust Inference Under Heteroskedasticity via the Hadamard Estimator

High-dimensional regression in practice: an empirical study of finite-sample prediction, variable selection and ranking

A Sharper Computational Tool for L2E Regression