P2.01-107 Analysis of Mutation Detection by Ctdna on the Basis of Metastatic Sites in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

R. Guo,H. Xu,J. Zhang,X. Ai,L. Liu,J. Zhao,X. Dong,L. Miao,R. Chen,X. Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1162
IF: 20.121
2018-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing represents a powerful tool to detect gene alterations in patients. However, differences in mutation detected by ctDNA related to metastatic sites in lung cancer have not been addressed before and remain to be explored. We reviewed 317 ctDNA samples from 310 lung adenocarcinoma patients with definite metastasis at our institute. Somatic mutation profiles were analyzed using hybridization capture based next-generation sequencing (NGS), which enables the simultaneous detection of single-nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, rearrangements, and copy-number alterations of 1021 genes. Patients were divided into two groups according to metastatic sites. Any case with metastasis to the bone, liver or adrenal gland falls into the major organ metastasis group, while any case with metastasis to the lung, pleura or lymph node belongs to the local metastasis group. No genetic alteration was detected in 14 (11.5%) of 122 samples in the major organ group and 35 (17.9%) of 195 in the local group. And distant metastasis is associated with more mutations on average detected by ctDNA (5.26 for the major organ group vs 3.72 for the local group; p=0.0039). As for genes involved, the most common mutated ones are EGFR and TP53 for both groups, with an overall mutation rate being 40.6% and 33.2% respectively. And just as average gene alterations mentioned above, the mutation rates of EGFR and TP53 are much higher in the major organ group (49.6% vs 35.2% for EGFR; 43.6% vs 26.9% for TP53). Besides, mutations of NF1, MLL3, KRAS and KEAP1 are more frequent in the major organ group while mutation rate of PIK3CA is slightly higher in the local group (Table). More gene alterations were detected by sequencing of ctDNA in patients of lung adenocarcinoma with major organ metastasis compared to those with only local metastasis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?