Comparison of flux gradient and chamber techniques to measure soil N 2 O emissions

Mei Bai,Helen Suter,Shu Kee Lam,Thomas K. Flesch,Deli Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-90
2018-01-01
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
Abstract:Abstract. Improving the direct field measurement techniques to quantify gases emissions from the large agriculture farm is challenging. We compared nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions measured with static chambers to those from a newly developed micrometeorological flux gradient (FG) approach. Measurements were made at a vegetable farm following chicken manure application. The FG calculations were made with a single open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP-FTIR) spectrometer (height of 1.45 m) deployed in a slant-path configuration: sequentially aimed at retro reflectors at heights of 0.8 and 1.8 m above ground. Hourly emissions were measured with the FG technique, but once a day between 10:00 and 13:00 with chambers. We compared the concurrent emission ratios (FG/Chambers) between these two techniques, and found N 2 O emission rates from celery crop farm measured at mid-day by FG were statistically higher (1.4 times) than those from the chambers measured at the same time. Our results suggest the OP-FTIR slant-path FG configuration worked well in this study: it was sufficiently sensitive to detect the N 2 O gradients over our site, giving high temporal resolution N 2 O emissions corresponding to a large measurement footprint.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?