NLR As a Prognostic Factor in Solid Tumors and in a Transplantable Solid Tumor Mouse Model
R. Kabarriti,Y. Zhang,T. Savage,S. Baliga,P. Brodin,S. Kalnicki,M. K. Garg,C. Guha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.646
2018-01-01
Abstract:Elevated serum neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported as a poor prognostic biomarker of overall survival (OS) in certain cancers. However, the mechanism associated with the poor outcome remains to be elucidated. Here we investigate the association between elevated NLR at diagnosis and OS in a large database of patients with solid tumors. In pilot studies, we model NLR in a transplantable solid tumor mouse model. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with solid tumors in our institution between 2005-2016. Elevated NLR was defined as >4.0 and the association with OS was determined using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status, smoking status, Charlson co-morbidity score, stage, and distant metastasis at diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the cohort overall and stratified for either disease site or stage. For the mouse model, we utilized a 4T1 triple negative breast carcinoma. 4T1 cells were injected in the mammary fat pad of female Balb/C mice. We monitored peripheral blood NLR, primary tumor growth, and survival after inoculation without treatment. Initial NLR was measured when a palpable tumor formed and weekly thereafter, with high and low NLR designations being determined based on the median of the animal cohort. A total of 27,373 patients were included in the analysis. Elevated NLR was an independent predictor of OS with HR of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.76-2.00; p< .001), and also an independent predictor for OS in most individual disease sites (table 1). The association was strongest in anal cancer and mesothelioma. HRs were 1.6, 2.0, 1.6, 1.8 for stage I, II, III, IV respectively (all p<.001). The differences in HRs were significant between disease sites (p=0.01), but not between stages (p=0.14). In the mouse model, NLR did not correlate with tumor size and we found no difference in rate of tumor growth between high and low NLR animals. However, mice with low NLR demonstrated improved OS with increasing log-rank significance (p=0.081, p=0.0561, p=0.027) as tumors progressed. Day 41 OS survival was 43% in the initial low NLR group as compared with 0% in the initial high NLR group (p=0.11). Maintaining a low NLR across all blood draws was associated with a significant improvement in OS (p=0.006).Abstract SU_41_2403; Table 1(top 9 sites by HR)Site (n)HR (95% CI)Anal (304)4.9 (1.5-15.6)Mesothelioma (67)4.5 (1.1-19.0)Nasopharyngeal (116)2.6 (0.8-8.2)Urothelial (883)2.4 (1.5-3.9)Prostate (5,439)2.2 (1.9-2.7)Breast (8,909)2.0 (1.7-2.4)Liver (1,586)2.0 (1.6-2.4)NSCLC (645)1.9 (1.5-2.4)Gastroesophageal (1,583)1.8 (1.5-2.2) Open table in a new tab An elevated NLR is an independent poor prognostic marker for OS in most solid tumors. In the mouse model, high NLR was also associated with worse OS. Strategies looking at modifying NLR and its impact on survival are ongoing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?