A New Classification of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Y. Zhang,T.-B. Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.1906
IF: 3.842
2018-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Introduction: A good assessment system of acute pancreatitis is important for clinical studies. RAC is widely used but neglects the role of necrotic infection, as well DBC underestimates the early death patients. So we developed “13 grades”. Methods: “I, II, III and IV” mean multiple persistent, single persistent, transient or no OF while “a, b and o” for infective, aseptic and no complications respectively. By the mean of “Roman letters + English letters” we evaluated AP patients who survived the early OF period into the local complications period (see figure A), “X” represented death in early stage due to OF. Mortality, surgical rates and ICU stay were retrospectively analyzed in 313 AP patients, compared with RAC and DBC. Result: Survival analysis between “I, II, III, IV” and “a, b, o” validated the division of AP in two stages by OF and local complications (see figure C). ICU stay, surgical rates were significantly different between 13 levels (see figure B). X, Ia, IIa, Ib, IIb, Io and IIo all belonged to SAP with 2012RAC, with different mortality. With 2012DBC, group X was underestimated as SAP due to without infection (see figure D). Conclusion: “13 levels” was easy for memory and application by two letters for critical factors in two stages of pancreatitis. With the help of subdividing and bug removing the homogeneity and accurity of classification both increased. Keywords: Severe/Critical acute pancreatitis (SAP/CAP); organ failure (OF); Revision of Atlanta classification in 2012 (RAC); Determinant-based classification in 2012 (DBC).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?