Quantitative Measurement of Total Erbb2 (H2T), P110 T-Erbb2, and Erbb2: Erbb3 (H23D) Heterodimer Expression and P110 T-Erbb2 in Malignant Progression from Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC)

Yu Zong,Kunwei Shen,Jeff Sperinde,Gerald Wallweber,Weidong Huang,John William Winslow,Wenchuan Liang,Mark D. Pegram
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.12089
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:12089 Background: We previously reported that human mammary epithelial cell lines stably expressing p110 t-erbB2, but not p95 nor erbB2 intracellular C-terminal fragment, significantly increased cell migration, invasion and xenograft formation -- more than full length p185 erbB2 [Ward, et al., Oncogene. 2013;32(19):2463-74]. Moreover, published frequency of erbB2 overexpression is higher in DCIS (41%) than IDC(~20%), suggesting erbB2 may play a role in tumor initiation, rather than progression to invasion. We hypothesized that p185 erbB2 in DCIS is insufficient to cause an invasive phenotype, and that enrichment of p110 t-erbB2 facilitates malignant progression to IDC. Methods: H2T, p110 t-erbB2, and H23D were quantified using the proximity-based HERmark and VeraTag assay technology (CLIA/CAP-certified conditions) in 67 DCIS and 70 IDC erbB2-amplified/overexpressed FFPE samples. Macrodissection ensured pure IDC or DCIS samples. Measurements were normalized to cell line standards of known H2T, p110 t-erbB2 and H23D levels, with cutoffs established as previously described [Huang W, et al., Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:303-311; Sperinde J, et al., Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(16):4226-35]. Results: p110 t-erbB2 was higher in IDC than DCIS cases (p = 0.036). Level of H2T overexpression was strongly associated with high p110 t-erbB2 levels in IDC patients (R2= 0.51, p < 0.001), but not in DCIS. p110 t-erbB2 difference between IDC vs. DCIS was more pronounced in the H2T overexpressed subset (p < 0.001). H2T and p110 t-erbB2 expression were in agreement with erbB2 IHC staining (H2T p = 0.002; p110 t-erbB2 p = 0.04, respectively); and inversely correlated with estrogen receptor levels (H2T p = 0.009; p110 t-erbB2 p = 0.004, respectively). In IDC, high expression of H23D levels were not significantly different between DCIS and IDC cases (p = 0.13). Conclusions: Our study is the first quantitative assessment of H2T, p110 t-erbB2 as well as H23D expression in both DCIS and IDC. These data suggest a potential pathophysiologic role of p110 t-erbB2 in driving progression of erbB2 positive DCIS to IDC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?