Methylomes Variation to Predict Exemestane Resistance in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Xiao-Ran Liu,Ru-Yan Zhang,Hao Gong,Hope S. Rugo,Jian Tie,Lingbo Chen,Yuan Fu,Jianwei Che,Bin Shao,Feng-Ling Wan,Wei-Yao Kong,Guo-Hong Song,Han-Fang Jiang,Guo-Bing Xu,Huiping Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e24029
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e24029 Background: In estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients (pts), more than 30% have primary hormone therapy (HT) resistance while the precise mechanism underlies remain unclear. Our study, for the first time, focused on the relationship between the methylomes variation and the exemestane resistance (EXEr). Methods: All 16 pts received first-line exemestane based HT were prospectively recruited in our center. Blood samples of baseline, first follow-up and disease progression (PD) were collected. Pts (4/16) who had PD within 6 months under exemestane treatment were considered EXEr, otherwise, pts were considered EXE sensitive (EXEs). Circulating tumor DNA derived methylomes was detected using DNA bisulfite treatment followed by the next-generation sequencing. EXEr related differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were screened using Bismark software (Krueger et al, 2011). Results: The median follow-up of present cohort was 19.0 months. The EXEr related DMRs in terms of both methylation density (MD) and methylation ratio (MR) were summarized in table below. During the treatment, demethylation of R6 was a positive predictor for EXEs (AUC=0.95, P=0.011). Meanwhile, the High MR level of R3a at baseline predicts EXEr (AUC=0.93, P=0.016). Using the methylomes variation of R6, we successfully stratified patients in terms of progression free survival (Cutoff=0.5, P=0.013). Similar predictive value was found when using the MR level of R3a at baseline (Cutoff=0.815, P=0.025) Conclusions: Methylomes variation in certain DMRs could predicts EXEr with clinical potential. However, retest of our finding in a larger prospective study are needed in future works. Table 1. Genomic location of DMRs (abbreviation) P value for methylation density P value for Methylation ratio Overlap genes Chr3 [67800000-67999999] (R3a) 0.026 0.049 SUCLG2-AS1 Chr3 [140200000-140399999] (R3b) 0.029 0.038 CLSTN2; CLSTN2-AS1; TRIM42 Chr6 [32400000-32599999] (R6) 0.005 0.013 HLA-DRA; HLA-DRB5; HLA-DRB6; HLA-DRB1 Chr9 [46800000-46999999] (R9) 0.019 0.002 FAM74A1 Chr10 [46400000-46599999] (R10) 0.019 0.034 PTPN20 Chr12 [101200000-101399999] (R12) 0.016 0.041 ANO4 Chr1[149600000-149799999] (R1) 0.026 0.050 LINC00623; LINC00869; LOC103091866
What problem does this paper attempt to address?