Global Quantitative Synthesis on the Patterns and Drivers of Funneling Ratio and Enrichment Ratio for Stemflow
Meng-Di Wu,Zhi-Yun Jiang,Xiao Yang,Buerlan Yeerbolati,Lin Huang,Ying-Yin Zhong,Han-Wen Zhang,Xiao-Yan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108253
IF: 6.367
2024-01-01
CATENA
Abstract:Stemflow has been increasingly recognized as an important ecohydrological process altering the water cycle and biogeochemistry processes within vegetated ecosystems. The funneling ratio (FR) and enrichment ratio (ER) of stemflow are two common metrics to express the funneling efficiency of water and solute compared with bulk precipitation on an equivalent area. However, variation in patterns and drivers of FR and ER for stemflow across global biomes remains poorly understood, which constrain predictions of biome hydrological cycle by climate models under global climate change. Here, we compiled data from 477 peer-reviewed publications with 1040 observations to calculate the FR and ER of stemflow at global scale. The boosted regression trees (BRT) model was employed to quantify the relative importance of biotic and abiotic variables on FR and ER of stemflow. The results indicated that the average value of FR across global biomes was 23.94, with 82.8 % of the observations greater than 1. The FR in different biomes displayed a significant variability, with relatively higher values in water limited ecosystems but lower values in humid rain forests. The BRT model showed that biotic variables including diameter at breast height (DBH), plant height, and stem density were the dominant predictors for FR, accounting nearly 60 % of the relative importance for FR. For ER, the global average values for all selected ions, cations, and anions were 79.63, 89.05, and 46.33, respectively, with relatively higher ER values in base cations (e.g. K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+). Biotic variables, such as stem density, DBH, and plant height, were found to be the dominant predictors for the selected base cations of ER. To conclude, although stemflow is much smaller than throughfall, its utility in providing water and nutrients for vegetation growth is much greater than that of throughfall and precipitation, and has important implications for the understanding of ecohydrological processes in the changing global environments.