Theoretical Model and Clinical Validation of Blood Tumor Mutation Burden (btmb) Detection for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Jianchun Duan,Zhijie Wang,Jing Lu,Hua Bai,Rui Wan,Shuhang Wang,Jiachen Xu,Xinkai Cao,Hua Dong,Tongfu Xu,Shangli Cai,Fu-Gen Li,Jie Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.12034
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:12034 Background: Tumor mutational burden(TMB) measured by whole exome sequencing (WES) or cancer gene panel (CGP) sequencing, has been identified to be associated with clinical outcome to anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment. However, a considerable proportion of patients(pts) with advanced lung cancer cannot acquire enough tumor tissue for TMB detection. Here, we defined an optimal gene panel for TMB estimation and validated the availability of blood TMB (bTMB) from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1/PDL1. Methods: A theoretical model of measuring TMB by CGP was established including 9205 WES-measured samples of 33 tumor types based on TCGA database. We further designed a panel (CT150) including 62 hotspot genes and 88 lung-cancer related genes, and built a robust bTMB detection pipeline. Correlation of CT150-measured bTMB and WES-measured TMB from paired tumor tissue in 30 NSCLC patients was analyzed to validate our model. Public clinical dataset and an independent clinical cohort were used to evaluate the association of bTMB with the efficacy of anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment. Results: Our model demonstrated that at least 100 genes need to be included in CGP when estimating WES based TMB, which was identified being influenced by the choice of hotspot genes, the weight of nonsynonymous mutations and the sequencing depth. In most tumor types, the CT150-measured TMB is highly correlated with WES-measured TMB. The bTMB and WES-based tumor TMB (tTMB) in 30 NSCLC patients is highly correlated. pts with high TMB estimated by CT150 had a significantly longer median progression free survival (mPFS) (14.5 vs 4.1 months, p = 0.01) than those with low TMB in the published Rizvi cohort (N = 34) . In a pilot study of 12 NSCLC pts treated with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors, pts with bTMB-high (designated as≥8 muts) had higher durable clinical benefit (DCB) rate and longer mPFS than those of bTMB-low (DCB %: 100% vs 42.9%, mPFS: 9.9 vs 2.9 months, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The designed CT150 panel can be utilized to estimate the TMB in the majority of cancer types. The bTMB estimated by this panel might provide a noninvasive biomarker assay to identify NSCLC pts benefitting from PD1/PDL1 inhibitors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?