Deep Analysis to Inconsistent Results of EGFR Mutation Status in Tumor Tissues and Plasma DNA in Advanced NSCLC.

Jie Wang,Rui Wan,Hua Bai,Zhijie Wang,Jun Zhao,Minglei Zhuo,Tongtong An,Jianchun Duan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e20591
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e20591 Background: Around 30% patients with EGFR mutation presented inconsistent status of EGFR mutation between in tissues and plasma. Here, we explored the potential reason and clinical significance for the patients with EGFR mutation positive in cell-free tumor DNA(ctDNA) but negative in corresponding tumor tissues. Methods: A total of 472 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation affirmed by Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) receiving EGFR-TKIs were assigned into the three subgroups. Patients with EGFR mutation T- and B+ were re-evaluated by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next generation sequence(NGS), and seven surgical resection samples were microdissected to analyze heterogeneity of EGFRmutation distribution by ARMS, ddPCR and NGS. Results: Of all 472 patients, 312 harbored EGFR mutations in both tissue and blood(T+/B+ ), 160 patients carried mutation only in tissue (131 cases, T+/B-) or blood (29 cases, T-/B+) by ARMS. TheddPCR approach confirmed the EGFR mutation in ctDNA of 29 patients. And among their corresponding tumor tissues, 7 cases came from surgical resection and 22 cases were biopsy samples. 13 patients were detected EGFR mutation in biopsied primary tumor(n = 10), and live metastasis (n = 2) or CTC(n = 1), Five of the seven surgical resection samples had intratumoral EGFR mutation heterogeneity, and the fraction of EGFR mutated sequences in tumor foci ranged from 0.10% to 1.25% (median, 0.24%). For remaining 11 samples, 4 cases were detected low abundance of EGFR mutation by NGS and another 7 cases had no sufficient tissues for NGS analysis. The PFS to EGFR-TKIs was numerically inferior in patients carrying EGFRmutation T-/B+ (5.7months, 95% CI, 0.9 to 10.5), compared with that in the patients with T+ and B+/- [(9.1months, CI, 8.07 to 10.1; 9.7months, 95% CI, 8.9 to 10.6, p = 0.811). Conclusions: Intra-tumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutation and low sensitivity of detection methods may contribute to EGFR mutation T- and B+, and low content of EGFR mutation in this subgroup may associated with short PFS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?