Parallel VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR of ALK Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Response to Crizotinib.

Chunwei Xu,Wen-xian Wang,Meiyu Fang,Yan-ping Chen,Yu Chen,Li-hua Zhong,Fang-fang Chen,Wu Zhuang,Gen Lin,Xiao-hui Chen,Hai-peng Xu,Yun-jian Huang,Yan-Fang Guan,Xin Yi,Tarigfeng Lv,Xiao-jiang Wang,Yi Shi,Xian-dong Lin,Gang Chen,Yong Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.11623
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:11623 Background: Advanced NSCLC patients who harbor (ALK) rearrangement were sensitive to crizotinib. However, not all ALK-positive patients benefit equally from crizotinib. A method for determining ALK rearrangement is RT-PCR, the Chinese FDA has approved RT-PCR to detect ALK rearrangement. In this regard, VENTANA IHC is a standard method to identify ALK protein overexpression in NSCLC. However, up to now, it is still largely unknown about the response to crizotinib for Chinese NSCLC patients having ALK overexpress detected by VENTANA IHC. To better clarify the clinical implication of VENTANA IHC to detect ALK rearrangement, we compared the curative effect and survival by the two methods in advanced NSCLC patients and analysis VENTNA IHC and RT-PCR inconsistent cases. Methods: A total of 1720 patients with NSCLC who had their ALK rearrangement detected by IHC and/or RT-PCR were included in this analysis. And we compared the efficacy and survival of patients with ALK positive detected by IHC and RT-PCR. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect patients whom two methods were not consistent. Results: 187/1720 patients were identified as ALK-positive by IHC and/or RT-PCR and 66 patient received crizotinib. We identified 172/1674 patients had ALK positive by IHC method, 41/322 patients had ALK rearrangements by RT-PCR method. And 29/276 patients with ALK positive were simultaneously analyzed by IHC and RT-PCR. The overall response rates (ORR) were 65.90% by IHC and 55.88% by RT-PCR, respectively. And the disease control rates (DCR) were 86.36% by IHC and 76.47% by RT-PCR. The median PFS of IHC was 8.5 months and RT-PCR was 9.2 months Targeted next-generation sequencing in the special type: Among 6 cases of 17 cases ALK positive patients were inconsistent by IHC and RT-PCR performed with NGS, 4 cases were identified to have EML4-ALK fusions, and 2 cases were KCL1-ALK(ND) and FBXO36-ALK (PFS 21.2 months). Conclusions: VENTANA IHC is a reliable and rapid screening tool in routine pathologic laboratories for the identification of suitable candidates for targeted therapy. It has a moderate sensitivity and a slightly higher curative effect, and some VENTANA IHC positive but RT-PCR negative cases may benefit from crizotinib.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?