Survival Impact of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Jingjing Liu,Xiaoyun Wan,Yuanming Shen,Xueqian Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e17546
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e17546 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (RESOC) patients and to assess prognostic factors on overall post-recurrence survival time. Methods: From the electronic databases of the Department of gynecological oncology at Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University between 2000 and 2015, a cohort of 190 RESOC patients were selected using the following inclusion criteria: primary ovarian、peritoneal and fallopian tubal cancer with serous histology who had received up to three previous courses of platinum-based chemotherapy and who were progression free for at least 6 months.These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapy method after relapse: secondary cytoreduction & chemotherapy (n = 28) and chemotherapy alone (n = 162). Survival analysis and comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, Wilcoxon test and Cox multivariate proportional hazards model Results: The overall survival (OS) in secondary cytoreduction & chemotherapy group was significantly longer than the chemotherapy alone group, the median OS was 75 months (95%CI 56.261-93.739) versus 45 months (95%CI 40.518-49.482) (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the median OS was significantly correlated with primary optimal cytoreduction(p = 0.003), early stage(p = 0.021), CA125≤1000U/ml (p = 0.009), recurrent interval > 12months (p < 0.001) and secondary cytoreduction (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that primary optimal cytoreduction, recurrent interval and therapy method after relapse were independent associated factors (P = 0.008, P < 0.001, p = 0.002 respectively). Conclusions: After careful selection, optimal cytoreduction can be achieved in most patients who are subjected to secondary surgical cytoreduction with a better OS. Primary optimal cytoreduction and recurrent interval represent the most important prognostic factors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?