3d Hdr Intracavitary Brachytherapy Combined With Complementary Applicator-Guided External Beam Radiotherapy For 338 Patients With Stage Iib-Iiib Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Phase Ii Prospective Study With Long-Term Follow-Up.

Jin Yi Lang,Zixuan Fan,Peng Xu,Mei Feng,Weidong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.5530
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:5530 Background: For uterine cervical cancer (UCC) patients with asymmetric parametric lesions, 3D HDR-intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) could not cover all the lesions, resulting in residual lesion and treatment failure. To settle this problem, a novel treatment modal of 3D HDR-ICBT combined with complementary applicator-guided external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was used for UCC patients with stage IIB-IIIB in present study. Methods: Between June 2010 and June 2015, 338 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IIIB) were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Imaged guided IMRT was used for external beam radiotherapy, 45Gy/25f. The chemotherapy was weekly cisplatin (40mg/m2). Four fractions of 3D HDR-ICBT combined with complementary applicator-guided external beam radiotherapy were used. The prescribed dose for HR-CTV and IR-CTV was 7Gy (D90) and 5Gy (D90). Dose constraints for organs at risk were D2cc <70 Gy for rectum, and D2cc<90 Gy for bladder in terms of equivalent total dose in 2 Gy fractions as GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Results: Median follow-up was 64 months (11–71 months). The D 90 of GTV, HR-CTV, and IR-CTV in all cases were 93.4 (85.1-107.8) Gy, 86.4 (79.9-91.3) Gy and 72.3 (70.8-75.2) Gy, respectively. The D2 CC of bladder, rectum and sigmoid were 74.3Gy、65.5Gy and 64.1Gy, respectively. 5-year LRC, DFS, and OS was 90.8%, 84.1% and 80.8%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. The grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal acute and late toxicities were 2.1% and 5.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of HDR-ICBT with an applicator-guided IMRT is feasible for uterine cervical cancer patients with asymmetric parametric lesions. Further study is needed to determine whether this treatment modal could be used to replace the invasive interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in the cases of locally advanced cervical cancer where HR-CTV coverage cannot be obtained with ICBT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?