Abstract:<p>This paper examines whether strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures are value relevant for investors and analysts in the context of China. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from One Belt One Road (OBOR) theme indices, we construct a rating system of strategic CSR disclosures including five dimensions and 20 indicators and perform a principal component analysis and a non‐hierarchical cluster analysis to group sample firms. We find that the market has a positive reaction to strategic CSR disclosures, but the market fails to perceive whether such disclosures are credible. We also find that the number of analysts following a firm is positively associated with its strategic CSR disclosures, and the positive association between strategic CSR disclosures and analysts following is less pronounced for firms with lower credibility. Additional analyses demonstrate that the higher the strategic CSR disclosure quality the more the positive market reaction and that the higher the strategic CSR disclosure quality the more the numbers of analysts following, but this positive association between disclosure quality and analysts following is discounted by a firm's lower credibility. Additional analyses further confirm that the CSR disclosure mandate has a negative moderating effect on investors' and analysts' positive reactions to strategic CSR disclosures. We do not find convincing evidence that the ownership of foreign institutional investors (QFII) has a moderating effect on investors' and analysts' reactions to strategic CSR disclosures. Finally, our extended analyses reveal that strategic CSR disclosures have a positive effect on firm performance with a complementary mediation of innovation.</p>

Do Investors Listen for the Meanings Behind Executives’Words? an Empirical Analysis Based on Management Tones

Does the Management Tone Information Convey the Level of Firm Innovation? : Evidence from Earnings Communication Conferences of GEM Listed Companies

Annual report tone and divergence of opinion: evidence from textual analysis

Tone emphasis and insider trading

Management's tone in MD&A disclosure and investment efficiency: Evidence from China

When Investors Speak, Do Firms Listen? the Role of Investors' Dividend‐related Complaints from Online Earnings Communication Conferences

Does management tone matter in information disclosure? Evidence from IPO online roadshows in the SSE STAR market

When the Use of Positive Language Backfires: The Joint Effect of Tone, Readability, and Investor Sophistication on Earnings Judgments

Managerial Ability, Tone of Earnings Announcements, and Market Reaction

Tone of Earnings Announcements in Sin Industries

Rational catering of irrational emotions: Investor sentiment and executive tone

Can Management Tone Predict IPO Performance? – Evidence from Mandatory Online Roadshows in China

Can the MD&A Tone of Listed Firms' Annual Reports Predict Their Future Performance? Empirical Evidence Based on Machine Learning Text Analysis

The impact of ESG performance, reporting framework, and reporting assurance on the tone of ESG disclosures: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Is the tone of the government-controlled media valuable for capital market? Evidence from China's new energy industry

Information Content of Stock Prices and Earnings Management:Evidence from the Chinese Stock Markets

Textual Tone in Corporate Financial Disclosures: a Survey of the Literature

Investor Limited Attention, Opinion Divergence, and Post-earnings-announcement Drift: Evidence from China

Cost of Equity Capital and Annual Report Tone Manipulation

Do investors and analysts value strategic corporate social responsibility disclosures? Evidence from China

Management tone and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed companies' involvement in rural revitalization