Efficiency Of Anlotinib Hydrochloride As 3rd Line Treatment In Patients (Pts) From A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase Iii Trial, An Exploratory Subgroup Analysis Of Alter0303 Trial For The Previous Therapy Strategy Effect

Q. Wang,Baohui Han,Kai Li,Li Zhang,Jianhua Shi,Zhehai Wang,Ying Cheng,Jianxing He,Yuankai Shi,Weiqiang Chen,Xiuwen Wang,Yi Luo,Kejun Nan,Faguang Jin,Baolan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e21182
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e21182 Background: ALTER 0303 trial (NCT02388919) has demonstrated that anlotinib could significantly prolonged OS (primary point) and PFS in refractory advanced NSCLC pts as 3rd line treatment. Methods: All eligible adult IIIB/IV NSCLC pts were stratified by EGFR type and previous therapeutic strategies. The impacts on the efficacy of anlotinib were analyzed by OS and PFS. Results: According to different EGFR mutation status, data for the impact of previous therapeutic strategies on anlotinib treatment have shown in the following table Conclusions: The subgroup analysis indicated that in the 3rd line treatment pts could benefit from anlotinib regardless of the previous therapeutic strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02388919. EGFR type WT M+ M+ Pem/Pla 57 vs 135 Doc/Pla 66 vs 125 Pac/Pla 40 vs 68 Vin/Pla 23 vs 53 Gem/Pla 59 vs 116 Pem/Pla 37 vs 74 Doc/Pla 34 vs 63 Pac/Pla 14 vs 27 Vin/Pla 13 vs 21 Gem/Pla 18 vs 40 Gefitinib 20 vs 49 Erlotinib 12 vs 22 Icotinib 11 vs 26 1st line 11 vs 16 2nd line 31 vs 75 mOS Placebo 7.17 6.30 7.13 6.13 7.17 6.27 6.23 6.93 4.03 4.98 4.23 9.73 4.03 3.53 7.03 Anlotinib 8.60 9.83 7.93 9.10 8.37 10.60 11.10 15.13 NE 11.10 10.60 15.83 9.43 11.10 10.70 P 0.201 0.061 0.287 0.043 0.644 0.030 0.107 0.174 0.010 0.062 0.008 0.347 0.246 0.019 0.170 HR 0.79 (0.55, 1.13) 0.71 (0.50, 1.02) 0.78 (0.49, 1.24) 0.56 (0.32, 0.99) 0.91 (0.63, 1.34) 0.57 (0.34, 0.95) 0.65 (0.38, 1.10) 0.54 (0.22, 1.33) 0.32 (0.13, 0.79) 0.53 (0.26, 1.05) 0.43 (0.23, 0.82) 0.62 (0.22, 1.70) 0.60 (0.25, 1.43) 0.31 (0.11, 0.87) 0.69 (0.40, 1.18) mPFS Placebo 1.40 1.63 1.80 1.00 2.67 0.73 0.73 1.37 0.98 1.07 0.87 1.12 0.73 0.83 0.87 Anlotinib 4.70 5.63 4.30 5.60 5.57 5.60 4.67 5.63 4.67 5.60 5.63 6.80 4.47 4.30 5.57 P < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 < 0.000 0.030 < 0.000 < 0.000 0.003 < 0.000 0.022 < 0.000 HR 0.28 (0.19, 0.41) 0.26 (0.18, 0.38) 0.27 (0.16, 0.44) 0.20 (0.11, 0.37) 0.28 (0.19, 0.42) 0.20 (0.12, 0.32) 0.20 (0.13, 0.33) 0.25 (0.10, 0.60) 0.41 (0.18, 0.94) 0.28 (0.15, 0.53) 0.11 (0.05, 0.23) 0.31 (0.13, 0.71) 0.08 (0.02, 0.26) 0.32 (0.11, 0.91) 0.20 (0.12, 0.34)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?